Teams

13 Bon Air Powers Put Aways

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-08vs 17 CCV PeanutsLost 03
L#1 SinglesRobin Balsamo vs Julie Shudtz3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGail Covert vs Ann Kamps Taliaferro0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHeather Hogan vs Michelle Jessee4-6, 0-6
2025-11-03vs 2 ACAC Slice Slice Baby - RiceWon 10
W#2 SinglesKristen Powers vs Ashley Diersen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-29vs 14 Bon Air RhodesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Powers vs Emily Larson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-21vs 19 MAC Court Queens II - HarisovaLost 12
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Foster vs Elizabeth Carrier3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobin Balsamo vs Kayci McLeod4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesHeather Hogan vs Hannah Ozment7-5, 6-3
2025-10-14vs 16 WOCC Hamlin single ladiesWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Powers vs Amy Broderick7-6, 6-3
2025-09-30vs 12 KRA One Hit Wonders - HussLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Powers vs Amanda Stoneburner3-6, 4-6
2025-09-23vs 10 Magnolia Green WintersWon 21
L#1 SinglesPaige Wesselink vs Natalie Winters1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRobin Balsamo vs Keri Biggins6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesHeather Hogan vs Samantha Petrich7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs 9 Westwood DeanLost 03
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Foster vs Lauren Connor2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Woodroof vs Meriwether Arnett1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesGail Covert vs Kimberly Lloyd2-6, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Robin Balsamo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Kristen Powers
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.85
Adrienne Foster
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Sarah Woodroof
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Paige Wesselink
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.26
Gail Covert
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Heather Hogan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Woodroof + Adrienne Foster3245% games−2.8% vs expected
Gail Covert + Adrienne Foster134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Balsamo
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Kristen Powers
188W–193L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Adrienne Foster
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Sarah Woodroof
18W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Paige Wesselink
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Gail Covert
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Heather Hogan
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.