Teams

2*MFulton-UNC

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-23vs 4*MDuncker-HVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesLindsey Gouker vs Valerie Michael2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesErin Berliner vs Ana Goodwin2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Kerry Burleigh3-6, 2-6
2024-07-16vs 5*LKulp-EphLost 01
L#2 SinglesErin Berliner vs Ann Laros5-7
2024-07-09vs 1*GLoFrese-EPHLost 03
L#1 SinglesLindsey Gouker vs Becki Cleveland4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Gretchen LoFrese1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Juliana Maul4-6, 1-6
2024-06-25vs 3*JDeConto-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesHeather Hutchins vs Amanda Alexander Klein6-0, 6-0
2024-06-18vs 4*MDuncker-HVCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Melinda Duncker2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLindsey Gouker vs Stacey Smith6-1, 6-3
2024-06-11vs 5*LKulp-EphLost 02
L#1 SinglesErin Berliner vs Lauren Kulp1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSara Knechtel vs Ann Laros7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs 1*GLoFrese-EPHSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHeather Hutchins vs Barbara Wilhelm6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Gretchen LoFrese7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-21vs 3*JDeConto-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Berliner vs Julie DeConto3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Heather Hutchins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Rebekah Farris
published
3.00
Lindsay Mize
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Erin Berliner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.84
Lindsey Gouker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Sara Knechtel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.67
Meghan Fulton
published
2.39
Bronwyn Charlton
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Berliner + Sara Knechtel3256% games+4.1% vs expected
Erin Berliner + Lindsey Gouker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Hutchins
70W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.54
Rebekah Farris
39W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Lindsay Mize
111W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Erin Berliner
57W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Lindsey Gouker
24W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Sara Knechtel
44W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Meghan Fulton
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
2.67
2.5
Bronwyn Charlton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.