Teams

Burkwood Decker

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-14vs MAC- RhodusWon 10
W#3 DoublesAshley Hart / Pamla Dietz vs Heather Barefoot / Carol Gregory7-5, 4-4
2025-09-07vs SCC Franks/SpillerWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Decker / Pamla Dietz vs Kristen Walton / Karen Deaver6-4, 6-0
2025-08-30vs CCV AVERY 8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAudrey Butterworth / Melissa Allen vs Lucy Davis / Megan Hodges7-5, 6-3
2025-08-23vs KRA EdensWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Allen / Audrey Butterworth vs Harper Minarik / Becca Meekins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClaire Davis / Pamla Dietz vs Logan Glen / Kelley Glen6-4, 6-1
2025-08-16vs Avalon 8.5 LancasterWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Owens / Pamla Dietz vs Lauren McCormick / Daniela Otto6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-02vs HERM - WycinskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAudrey Butterworth / Melissa Allen vs Jackie Berens / Addie Miller6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.11
4.75
Raine Weis
published
4.33
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.21
Erin Decker
published
4.07
Lindsey O'Kane
published
3.97
Susan Powell
published
3.91
Pamla Dietz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Jennifer Owens
published
3.72
Theresa Hughes
published
3.65
Jordan McFee
published
3.57
Meredith White
published
3.34
Melissa Allen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Powell + Jennifer Owens10168% games+17.5% vs expected
Audrey Butterworth + Raine Weis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Audrey Butterworth
13W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.11
Raine Weis
14W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.75
4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
4.33
Erin Decker
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Lindsey O'Kane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Pamla Dietz
77W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Jennifer Owens
29W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Theresa Hughes
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jordan McFee
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Meredith White
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Melissa Allen
115W–116L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.