Teams

TOC.Irish

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 55 & Over · Summer Singles 55 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-04vs TOC.FulcherWon 10
W#1 SinglesBeth Spinarski vs Anne Farmer6-4, 6-2
2022-07-28vs TOC.FulcherSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBeth Spinarski vs Betsy Fulcher6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHarriet Wilson vs Anne Farmer2-6, 0-6
2022-07-21vs TOC.FulcherWon 20
W#1 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Anne Farmer6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesShelly Jude vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-14vs TOC.FulcherWon 30
W#1 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Marina Barthalmus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShelly Jude vs Betsy Fulcher6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrenda Pratt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-07vs TOC.FulcherSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBeth Spinarski vs Marina Barthalmus6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesShelly Jude vs Jane Hunter6-7, 2-6
2022-06-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Patricia Smith6-3, 6-2
2022-06-23vs TOC.FulcherSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBeth Spinarski vs Marina Barthalmus6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrenda Pratt vs Betsy Fulcher3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Tammy Bradley
published
3.33
Lynelle Boorey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Beth Spinarski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Regina Davis
published
3.13
Shelly Jude
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Michelle Fitzgerald
published
3.01
Harriet Wilson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Brenda Pratt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Jude + Regina Davis1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Bradley
8W–23L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Lynelle Boorey
98W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Beth Spinarski
117W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Regina Davis
36W–56L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–162L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Michelle Fitzgerald
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Harriet Wilson
66W–119L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Brenda Pratt
97W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.