Teams

JCM Stewart RAC

2024 Fall ONE Doubles RAC · RTC

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-20vs JPPM Kruse RACWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stewart / Cherisse Marcou vs Pamela Sinicrope / Mary Johnson7-6, 6-1
2024-10-13vs JPPM Kruse RACLost 01
L#1 DoublesElla Seehafer / Cherisse Marcou vs Paige Partain / Mary Johnson4-6, 0-6
2024-10-06vs JPPM Kruse RACWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stewart / Ella Seehafer vs Jodi Kruse / Pamela Sinicrope6-3, 6-1
2024-09-29vs JPPM Kruse RACWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Reps / Cherisse Marcou vs Paige Partain / Mary Johnson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-15vs JPPM Kruse RACLost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Reps / Ella Seehafer vs Paige Partain / Pamela Sinicrope1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for RTC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Megan Reps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Ella Seehafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Cherisse Marcou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Reps
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Ella Seehafer
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.52
4
Cherisse Marcou
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.