Teams

Temple Terrace Hawks - R. Warren

2024 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-10vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Costanza / Patrick Rairigh vs Sean Friday / Ken Kranick3-6, 6-7
2024-10-27vs Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Michael Costanza vs Erik Breitenbach / Jacob Munch4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKen Coulter / Daniel Shields vs Jason Lee / Gvozden Dokic2-6, 3-6
2024-10-06vs Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarvin Jones / Patrick Rairigh vs Sylvain Gauthier / Jacob Munch2-6, 1-6
2024-09-15vs Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesKen Coulter / Michael Costanza vs Brad Armagost / Jason Lee1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlvin MacAsinag / Daniel Shields vs Brian Stone / James Schneider3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Ken Coulter
published
3.41
Daniel Shields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Brian Westmoreland
published 3.5
Alvin MacAsinag
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Patrick Rairigh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
George Hawkins
published
James Whitaker
published
Marvin Jones
published
Michael Costanza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Costanza + Patrick Rairigh12658% gamesnot enough data
Michael Costanza + Marvin Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Marvin Jones + Alvin MacAsinag213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Shields + Patrick Rairigh123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Westmoreland + Ken Coulter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Coulter
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Daniel Shields
32W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Brian Westmoreland
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Alvin MacAsinag
53W–84L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Rairigh
108W–103L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Whitaker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marvin Jones
24W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Costanza
129W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.