Teams

Kirby/Knoxville

2024 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-14vs Danby/KnoxvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatie Rymer / Anna Douglas vs Kristie Danby / Charlene Smith6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Gregorius / Melissa Kirby vs Wendy Petty / Marissa Turner6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Brady / Christina Kaak vs Jennifer Douglas / Sarah Ross1-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Rachel Kimmel vs Janene Nordin / Kathy Smith4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-23vs Danby/KnoxvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesLauren Clarke / Katie Rymer vs Kristie Danby / Charlene Smith6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Kaak / Jennifer Brady vs Laura Wolfe / Jennifer Douglas6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Kirby / Mary Gregorius vs Lindsay McNabb / Kathy Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJordan Peters / Rachel Kimmel vs Cindy Henry / Lynn Johnson6-3, 6-1
2024-04-20vs Danby/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristina Kaak / Katie Rymer vs Sarah Ross / Kathy Smith6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Clarke / Mallory Jackson vs Wendy Petty / Marissa Turner6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Douglas / Jordan Peters vs Kristie Danby / Laura Wolfe6-7, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMelissa Kirby / Mary Gregorius vs Charlene Smith / Francesca Robinson7-6, 6-3
2024-04-13vs Danby/KnoxvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatie Rymer / Kate Willis vs Jennifer Douglas / Sarah Ross6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Gregorius / Rachel Kimmel vs Cindy Henry / Lynn Johnson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Mallory Jackson vs Kristie Danby / Janene Nordin4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesJennifer Kolman / Lexie Hill vs Francesca Robinson / Marissa Turner3-6, 6-7
2024-04-09vs Danby/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesJordan Peters / Lauren Clarke vs Kristie Danby / Charlene Smith1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Douglas / Katie Rymer vs Jennifer Douglas / Sara Wallingford6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKate Willis / Christina Kaak vs Marissa Turner / Laura Wolfe7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-30vs Danby/KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesRachel Kimmel / Lauren Clarke vs Kathy Smith / Charlene Smith6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMary Gregorius vs Kristie Danby2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Katie Rymer vs Wendy Petty / Marissa Turner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLexie Hill / Christina Kaak vs Sara Wallingford / Jennifer Douglas7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesAnna Douglas / Jennifer Kolman vs Lindsay McNabb / Francesca Robinson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Sarah Rainwater
published
4.20
Misty Cottrell
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Kate Willis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.03
Jordan Peters
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Rachel Kimmel
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.98
Christina Kaak
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Mary Gregorius
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Anna Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Lauren Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Lexie Hill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Kolman
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Rymer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Cottrell + Katie Rymer4164% games−12.3% vs expected
Misty Cottrell + Rachel Kimmel8162% gamesnot enough data
Misty Cottrell + Kate Willis5161% gamesnot enough data
Katie Rymer + Kate Willis404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Rainwater
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.33
Misty Cottrell
34W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
Kate Willis
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Jordan Peters
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
Rachel Kimmel
36W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Christina Kaak
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.98
4.5
Mary Gregorius
14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.85
4
Anna Douglas
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Clarke
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Lexie Hill
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
Jennifer Kolman
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Rymer
21W–2L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.