Teams

Colonial - Dunbar

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 W Monday DAY

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-03vs Paseo - ZimmerLost 01
L#3 DoublesGinny Asgeirsson / Karen Dunbar vs Sheri Coleman / Lisa DeLauder4-6, 3-6
2024-04-29vs LEECHAR/Lansdale/50&over7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Karen Dunbar vs Agnes O'Connor / Ruth Coburn1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-22vs Fiddlesticks - AloiaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Hudetz / Darla Wright vs Nancy Aloia / Angela Nisley3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Karen Dunbar vs Jodi Hynes / Bridget Mast6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-08vs UTC- ShotwellLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Harrsch / Judith Hudetz vs Sherri Campbell / Cynthia Sabatino4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Monday DAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Maureen McCollum
published
Darla Wright
published 4
3.34
Judith Hudetz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Julie LeVan
published
3.23
Shelley Marcus
published
3.19
Ginny Asgeirsson
published 3.5
3.18
Karen Moss
published
3.11
Christine Brodsky
published 3.5
Karen Dunbar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberly Harrsch
published
Mei-Mei Kirk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Marcus + Karen Moss3443% games−1.3% vs expected
Karen Dunbar + Christine Brodsky2343% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dunbar + Karen Moss123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Moss + Kimberly Harrsch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen McCollum
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Darla Wright
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Judith Hudetz
145W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
Julie LeVan
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Shelley Marcus
30W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ginny Asgeirsson
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Karen Moss
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Christine Brodsky
23W–54L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Harrsch
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mei-Mei Kirk
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.