Teams

Sa.Highsmith18M

2025 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-28vs Lo.Elliott18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesSally Highsmith / Paul Warren vs Heather Tuttle / Lincoln Larson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Patch / John Patch vs Griffin Lamb / Timothy Franklin0-6, 0-6
2025-07-27vs Ga.Fye18M3.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesSally Highsmith / Paul Warren vs Megan Black / Gary Fye6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKristen Patch / John Patch vs Jessica Williams / Christian Guthrie2-6, 1-6
2025-07-20vs Ju.Bryson18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Jones / Jake Jones vs Allie Hammond / Josh Fernandez6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Jones / Parker Jones vs Veronica Glass / Christopher Glass5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-13vs Ma.Morriston18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Highsmith / Paul Warren vs Jennifer Boyd / Christopher Leonard6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Patch / Kristen Patch vs THOMAS SIBRIZZI / Kathryn Sibrizzi6-1, 6-4
2025-07-09vs Br.Mann18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Warren / Sally Highsmith vs Clifton Mobley / Kay Bonavita6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristen Patch / John Patch vs Lauren Gentile / Anthony Gentile6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-22vs Pa.Spell18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Highsmith / Paul Warren vs Joshua Limon / Claire Limon3-6, 6-7
2025-06-15vs Ro.Burns18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSally Highsmith / Paul Warren vs Marc Best / Emily Best6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Patch / Kristen Patch vs Avril Tanner / John Tanner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-08vs Er.Hemminger18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Warren / Sally Highsmith vs Ben Rost / Michelle Gessner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Parker Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Chase Felmet
published 3.5
2.96
Janna Myers
published
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Doug Myers
published
2.64
Kyle Felmet
published
Jake Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Jones
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Chase Felmet
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Janna Myers
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Doug Myers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Kyle Felmet
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Jake Jones
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.