Teams

NJ BLUE

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs NJ TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryan Pivovar / Susan Bolton vs Yukiko Brooks / Christopher Johnstone6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-20vs BP REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Bolton / Bryan Pivovar vs Miranda Jackson / Lawrence McGaughy5-7, 0-6
2023-06-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Pivovar / Per Westholm vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-11vs MC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Bolton / Bryan Pivovar vs Michelle Kondrat / Patrick Martin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-28vs LEBTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Bolton / Bryan Pivovar vs Rebecca Duque / David Kannikal6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Pivovar / Per Westholm vs Tammy Gould / Chris Gould4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-21vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Bolton / Bryan Pivovar vs Manu Sharma / Jennifer Gilliland6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Pivovar / Per Westholm vs Michelle Campbell / Tim Lennek6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Bryan Pivovar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Denise Hernandez
published 4.5
4.00
Hank Fisher
published
3.85
Laura Pivovar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Per Westholm
published
Dan Mestaes
published 4
3.34
Susan Bolton
published
Anne Leoni
published 3.5
3.17
Matt Leoni
published
Irene Arguelles
published
Jason Bolton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Pivovar + Bryan Pivovar10655% games+7.9% vs expected
Bryan Pivovar + Susan Bolton2742% games−6.0% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Matt Leoni224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bryan Pivovar
85W–75L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Denise Hernandez
14W–28L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
4.14
Hank Fisher
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Laura Pivovar
125W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Per Westholm
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Dan Mestaes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Bolton
15W–30L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Anne Leoni
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Leoni
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Irene Arguelles
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Bolton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.