Teams

MVH Hoffman FWL A18-4.0M

2023 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-21vs PA Johnson FWL A18-4.0MLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Buurma / Paul Hoffman vs Tyler Fedewa / GEORGE CHANG3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJeff Disher vs Brent DeBack1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Rutherford / Jorge Vazquez vs Patrick van Tuinen / Casey Tjalsma5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPedro Martinez / Nick Labozzetta vs Michael Veldhuizen / Tyler Hough2-6, 0-6
2023-01-14vs MC Schimpf FWL A18-4.0MLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Buurma / Jose Vivas vs Brian Herr / Daniel Hillman6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Hoffman vs Slaven Condric2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNick Labozzetta / Paul Rutherford vs John Schimpf / Brian Greenlee3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLinus Resek vs Thomas Clark3-6, 4-6
2022-12-10vs MVS Williams FWL A18-4.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Rutherford / Nick Labozzetta vs Joshua Welt / Kevin Shaw6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Hoffman vs Roberto Martinez1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSteven Uk vs Ryan DeVries3-6, 2-6
2022-11-12vs MSU Dillinger FWL A18-4.0MLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrian Buurma / Paul Hoffman vs Sergey Ilyashov / Christopher Cuyar3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesFelipe Santos vs Raju Pusapati0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJorge Vazquez / Pedro Martinez vs Jason Perez / Zachary Dillinger4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJeff Disher vs Julian Sanders6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Rutherford / Jose Vivas vs Chris Reynolds / Jason Kraft6-1, 6-2
2022-10-15vs WH Ballines FWL A18-4.0MLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Buurma / Jose Vivas vs Dre Ballines / Albert O'Bryant0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesFelipe Santos vs Jeremy Nufer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinus Resek / Paul Hoffman vs Stephen Miller / Damond Timmerman2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNick Labozzetta vs Ian Person2-6, 6-7
2022-09-30vs PA Bont FWL A18-4.0MLost 05
L#1 DoublesLinus Resek / Paul Hoffman vs Daniel Bragg / Long Vu1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesFelipe Santos vs Ron Patrick2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Rutherford / Brian Buurma vs Trent Pontious / Mark Elders2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNick Labozzetta vs Andrew Rolls1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Vazquez / Steven Uk vs Scott Arlen / Harrison Brode6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PA Bont FWL A18-4.0M6026411181
2WH Ballines FWL A18-4.0M5122818187
3MSU Dillinger FWL A18-4.0M33151532259
4PA Johnson FWL A18-4.0M33131738285
5MVS Williams FWL A18-4.0M24121836240
6MC Schimpf FWL A18-4.0M24121837275
7MVH Hoffman FWL A18-4.0M0652550308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jose Vivas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Brian Buurma
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Rutherford
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Felipe Santos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeff Disher
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jorge Vazquez
published
Linus Resek
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Labozzetta
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Paul Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Pedro Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Uk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Rutherford + Jose Vivas5749% games+5.2% vs expected
Brian Buurma + Jose Vivas191953% games+2.3% vs expected
Brian Buurma + Paul Hoffman0531% games−1.0% vs expected
Brian Buurma + Paul Rutherford0627% games−17.1% vs expected
Jose Vivas + Jorge Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Jose Vivas + Paul Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Vivas
42W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Brian Buurma
32W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Paul Rutherford
21W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Felipe Santos
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Disher
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jorge Vazquez
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linus Resek
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Labozzetta
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Hoffman
14W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pedro Martinez
15W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Uk
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.