Teams

CBRC - Pak

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-16vs HRAC - Fuzzy Green BallsLost 04
L#1 DoublesSrinath Kannan / Peter Ruedel vs Rob LaVigne / Kirk Miller1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Cesar / Nate Pak vs Lennon Cork / Tim Arbogast2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEric Ferguson vs Damon Clegg4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Michael Jacoby vs Judah Caudill / William Gilchrist1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-16vs YTC - HiseyLost 05
L#1 DoublesWilliam Hampton / Peter Ruedel vs Sean Michael / Gabriel Michael0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Paul Cathcart0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEric Ferguson / Srinath Kannan vs Michael Hisey / Bogdan Albu2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNate Pak vs Seth Robins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAaron Cesar / Gughan Sathyaseelan vs Kirk Ehlis / Scott Jacky6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-15vs YTC - HiseyLost 14
W#1 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Michael Jacoby vs Cole Rojan / Scott Jacky6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAaron Cesar vs Paul Cathcart0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hampton / Srinath Kannan vs Sean Michael / Gabriel Michael1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Michael Hisey0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Ruedel / Eric Ferguson vs Bogdan Albu / William Levy0-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs EW-PC-HollowayLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Jacoby / Larry Bagaasen vs Ryan Brooks / Andrew Deskins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Keith Bjella0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hampton / Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh vs Srinivasa Repalle / Roman Andrew GAVINO0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSrinath Kannan vs Andrew McNabb0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNate Pak / Aaron Cesar vs Daryl Brown / John Hilmes1-6, 3-6
2025-03-14vs HRAC - Fuzzy Green BallsLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Jacoby / Larry Bagaasen vs Miguel Soler / Enrique Bouchez2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Judah Caudill1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEric Ferguson / Nate Pak vs Kirk Miller / Tim Arbogast2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRoderick Busalpa vs Lennon Cork1-3
L#3 DoublesWilliam Hampton / Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh vs Damon Clegg / Rob LaVigne2-6, 2-6
2025-03-14vs EW-PC-HollowayLost 05
L#1 DoublesLarry Bagaasen / Michael Jacoby vs Mike Robertson / Brian Cunnington2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Ruedel vs WOONGJO Choi0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRoderick Busalpa / Eric Ferguson vs Kaleb Harvey / Roman Andrew GAVINO3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNate Pak vs Keith Bjella0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSittilerk Trikalsaransukh / William Hampton vs John Hilmes / Daryl Brown2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Larry Bagaasen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Michael Jacoby
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Eric Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.48
Roderick Busalpa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.37
Gughan Sathyaseelan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Gavin Albritton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.30
Nate Pak
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.29
Aaron Cesar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Peter Ruedel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Srinath Kannan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
William Hampton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Bagaasen + Michael Jacoby3546% games−1.6% vs expected
Nate Pak + Gughan Sathyaseelan3441% games−6.8% vs expected
Roderick Busalpa + Eric Ferguson1536% games−7.8% vs expected
Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh + William Hampton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Larry Bagaasen
30W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Michael Jacoby
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Eric Ferguson
1W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
3
Roderick Busalpa
3W–20L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Gughan Sathyaseelan
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Gavin Albritton
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Nate Pak
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
3
Aaron Cesar
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
Peter Ruedel
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sittilerk Trikalsaransukh
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Srinath Kannan
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Hampton
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.