Teams

Chestnut Oaks Nelson

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-07vs WW Low & Slo - SlomanWon 32
W#1 DoublesErin Sheridan / JJ Thompson vs Jessica Parrent / Elizabeth Brogan6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hughes vs Penny Lowrey6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNiyati Upadhyay / Marlene Crockett vs Nicole Deiorio / Virginia Jamerson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBeth Condyles vs Amanda Boys3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Lloyd / Tessica Crampton vs Megan Waters / Catherine Stanley6-4, 6-2
2025-05-31vs ACAC BlackburnWon 41
L#1 DoublesJennifer Rutledge / Beth Condyles vs Fay Crawshaw / Brooke Olson3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJJ Thompson vs Mary Wagoner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNiyati Upadhyay / Tessica Crampton vs Theresa Bartholomew / Sandra Wright6-4, 5-4
W#2 SinglesMarlene Crockett vs Morgan Vargo6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Connor / Kimberly Lloyd vs Constance Brecht / Marydith Newman6-3, 6-1
2025-04-26vs WO Mathe/SwansonLost 14
W#1 DoublesErin Sheridan / JJ Thompson vs Sule Sauvigne / Kelly Beazley6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRebecca Hughes vs Zinie Sampson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrancie Mann / Naomi Nelson vs Nikki Powell / Catherine Hunt2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJennifer Rutledge vs Blair McDuff1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTessica Crampton / Kimberly Lloyd vs Katy Knierim / Mary Scott Swanson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-19vs Avalon Holsinger WKENDLost 23
L#1 DoublesBethany Watkins / Kimberly Lloyd vs Ashley Houghtaling / Jeanne Sarmento4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErin Sheridan vs Liz Wiebe6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNiyati Upadhyay / Rebecca Hughes vs Shannon Couvillion / Ann Flippin6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesFrancie Mann vs Clair Isenberg3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rutledge / Beth Condyles vs Kelly Schuler / Jessica Milligan3-6, 0-6
2025-04-05vs MRTC Battery Park Hawley 3.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesTessica Crampton / Naomi Nelson vs Joy Nyman / May Ratnakar4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJJ Thompson vs Autumn Joyal2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNiyati Upadhyay / Marlene Crockett vs Joanne Rosel / Gretchen Brophy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlison Mccrickard vs Kerry Whitacre6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrancie Mann / Michelle Christian vs Sarah Powers / Lucille Lindamood7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Erin Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.19
JJ Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.15
Lauren Connor
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.10
Rebecca Hughes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Jennifer Rutledge
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Alison Mccrickard
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kimberly Lloyd
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Bethany Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Francie Mann
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Michelle Christian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.51
Niyati Upadhyay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Beth Condyles
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Marlene Crockett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tessica Crampton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Condyles + Jennifer Rutledge1536% games−17.8% vs expected
JJ Thompson + Erin Sheridan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Sheridan
29W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
JJ Thompson
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Lauren Connor
38W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Rebecca Hughes
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Jennifer Rutledge
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Alison Mccrickard
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Lloyd
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Bethany Watkins
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Francie Mann
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Michelle Christian
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Niyati Upadhyay
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Beth Condyles
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Marlene Crockett
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tessica Crampton
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.