Bonanno/55s/3.0/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17

Ann Boushie

usually #1 Doubles 49%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3

2.97

Laura Bonanno

usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

2.77

Cody Westmoreland

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3

2.65

Ellen Sweetman

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published —

2.54

Diane Matherne

usually #3 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

—

Dennis Boushie Jr

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5

—

Dink McCoy

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published —

—

Erik Ernst

usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Joelle Cuevas

usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

—

John Stein

usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Kathie Daigle

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published —

—

Mark Maloney

usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published —

—

Melanie Olinde

usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published —

—

R Timothy Brown

usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published —

—

Ronnie Matherne

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Sweetman + Kathie Daigle	4–3	51% games	not enough data
Ellen Sweetman + R Timothy Brown	2–3	44% games	not enough data
R Timothy Brown + Kathie Daigle	3–2	44% games	not enough data
Dink McCoy + Diane Matherne	0–4	4 matches	not enough data
Ronnie Matherne + Mark Maloney	0–4	4 matches	not enough data
Melanie Olinde + Joelle Cuevas	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Dink McCoy + Ronnie Matherne	0–3	3 matches	not enough data
Diane Matherne + Ronnie Matherne	0–3	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ann Boushie

47W–18L career · 34 lines in 2026

<1%11%89%

3.17

—

Laura Bonanno

21W–16L career · 17 lines in 2026

<1%59%41%

2.97

Cody Westmoreland

17W–28L career · 27 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

2.77

—

Ellen Sweetman

20W–32L career · 28 lines in 2026

14%85%1%

2.65

Diane Matherne

16W–21L career · 21 lines in 2026

38%62%<1%

2.54

2.5

Dennis Boushie Jr

0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026

not enough data

—

Dink McCoy

9W–25L career · 18 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Erik Ernst

9W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Joelle Cuevas

26W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

John Stein

1W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kathie Daigle

15W–16L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mark Maloney

4W–26L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Melanie Olinde

8W–28L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

R Timothy Brown

16W–33L career · 24 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ronnie Matherne

9W–28L career · 20 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.