Teams

LWR Osher

2023 Sarasota Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 MXD Sunday

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-19vs Laurel Oak RosenbergSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWayne Osher / Celia Pena vs Vivek Kumar / Carla Rodman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Arrowood / Diana Stadelnikas vs Tom Heidenberger / Sandra Poston5-7, 3-6
2023-03-12vs Sarasota/Herke/40&Over8.0XWon 10
W#2 DoublesCelia Pena / Wayne Osher vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Chris New3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-19vs GT Bray ProulxLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuke Anderson / Diana Stadelnikas vs Yuka Pearl / Anthony Lizares2-6, 4-6
2023-02-12vs Laurel Oak RosenbergLost 01
L#2 DoublesLuke Anderson / Diana Stadelnikas vs David Rosenberg / Yudi Carpenter4-6, 5-7
2023-02-05vs Sarasota/Herke/40&Over8.0XLost 01
L#1 DoublesCelia Pena / David Arrowood vs Nina Mortazavi / Calvin Hac2-6, 4-6
2023-01-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Wayne Osher vs Cynthia Norwood / Bradley Taylor6-4, 6-4
2023-01-15vs SSC RisquezLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeith King / Claudia Kelly vs Sergio Molinari / Fabiola Beckmann3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
David Arrowood
published 4
3.70
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Karen Nicholson
published
3.69
Sheila Perry
published
3.66
Betty Jo Zeigler
published 4
3.62
Celia Pena
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Marc Rosenthal
published
3.42
Marcia Frost
published
3.19
Claudia Kelly
published 3.5
Jeff Munafo
published
Keith King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Wayne Osher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
David Arrowood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Betty Jo Zeigler
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Celia Pena
68W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Marc Rosenthal
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Claudia Kelly
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jeff Munafo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Keith King
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Wayne Osher
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.