Teams

Sarasota/Faulkner/55&Over6.0W

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 6.0 W Monday

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-03-17vs LBK Public SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Annmarie Iwanicki / Valri Poley6-3, 6-3
2025-03-14vs SSC TruexWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Donna Truex / Susan Mihm6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-03vs Courtside 50 LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Nina Bouclainville / Renee Walter6-4, 6-2
2025-02-26vs University Park LundinWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Elizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley6-0, 6-3
2025-02-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-10vs LBK Club SerlingWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Rebecca Schultz vs Beth Shribman / Bethany Buck7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-03vs SSC Grossman 55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie Hanbury / Leticia Baldwin vs Eileen Grossman / Jacqueline Moore4-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Sarasota/Voltz/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Allyson Miller / Renita Domek6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-20vs LWR AlsterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Chris Semler vs Joani Crean / Sylvia Day7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Lisa Powell vs Claudia Manley / Florie Black7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-13vs Heritage Oaks HottiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Pamela Mansager / Beth Gemmill6-4, 7-5
2025-01-06vs Sarasota/Pluss/55&Over6.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz vs Jana Bekavac / Jennifer Esposito6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarol Malone / Leticia Baldwin vs Nancy Whitacre / Lynne Cosler2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Dang Williamson
published 3.5
2.98
Denise McKenna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carol Malone
published 3
Julie Faulkner
published
Katie Scarfone
published
Leticia Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dang Williamson
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Denise McKenna
137W–116L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Carol Malone
27W–59L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Faulkner
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Scarfone
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leticia Baldwin
5W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.