Teams

NWW-MI-Yetman

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Christopher Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2023-03-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Martin / Alex Schmidt-Warnecke vs Adrian Dragusanu / Carlos Gomes6-4, 6-0
2023-02-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Dickinson / Alex Schmidt-Warnecke vs Raghu Havaldar / Zhe Yang6-2, 6-1
2023-02-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Dickinson / Christopher Martin vs James Modie / Grant Burton6-3, 6-3
2023-02-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Fauser / Alex Schmidt-Warnecke vs George Jakotich / Gary Schmidt6-0, 6-0
2023-01-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlex Schmidt-Warnecke / Christopher Dickinson vs Jarrod Taylor / Ryan Froondozo6-2, 6-1
2023-01-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Dickinson / Alex Schmidt-Warnecke vs Gurmit Singh / Pyoungchung Kim6-2, 6-1
2023-01-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Fauser / Alex Schmidt-Warnecke vs Matthew McCormick / Ed Evatt6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
69W–32L career
0%85%15%
3.48
3.5
Christopher Dickinson
68W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.