Teams

Dahl: Slice Girls

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Sooyeon Sung6-4, 6-2
2023-11-16vs Londer/Goldfine - OverservedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Allison Perry3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Julie Dahl vs Lauren Zaba / Leigh Waterman6-2, 6-0
2023-11-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Katherine Splett6-0, 6-1
2023-11-02vs Stordahl Kickin AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeeza Scheglowski / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Ana Paula Zamorano / Lisa Sheppard Pearson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Kelly Vegoe6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Dahl / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Kathleen Danner / Astrid Knott6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-19vs Stromberg Smash SquadWon 10
W#3 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Julie Dahl vs Jessica Galatz / Michelle Pelland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-12vs Culligan CrushersWon 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Tisha Colton6-2, 6-4
2023-10-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Kaley DeCou3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Geri Gambucci
published
3.21
Molly Lyons
published
3.16
Keela Cottew
published
3.16
Catherine Hosamane
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Aleksandra Fermstad
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Timek
published
Leeza Scheglowski
published
Linda Hauser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aleksandra Fermstad + Lisa Timek4259% games+1.1% vs expected
Catherine Hosamane + Aleksandra Fermstad7162% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geri Gambucci
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Molly Lyons
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Keela Cottew
18W–33L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Catherine Hosamane
163W–105L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Aleksandra Fermstad
117W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lisa Timek
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Leeza Scheglowski
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Hauser
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.