Teams

Southside - Matthews

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter

10 players · average NTRP / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-29vs San Jose - CrabtreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesValencia Oglesby / Irene Perazzo vs Cynthia Hodges / Phyllis Crabtree2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Simeoli / Iraida Rivera vs Margaret Samuels / Meg Sheffield1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Radford / Holly Depiesse vs Diane Martin / Tracy Libby5-7, 1-6
2025-02-22vs Winter Winner - Deercreek - KurtzLost 12
L#1 DoublesValencia Oglesby / Sampat Choudhary vs Karen Sayre / Tina Schumacher1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Marlowe / Iraida Rivera vs Melissa Kurtz / Torree Lein3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIrene Perazzo / Holly Depiesse vs Elizabeth Mavelle / Alisa Blanchard6-3, 6-1
2025-02-15vs San Jose - CrabtreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Marlowe / Irene Perazzo vs Cynthia Hodges / Margaret Samuels0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori Gates / Margaret Ivers vs Diane Martin / Melody Longstreth5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHenny Benson Crane / Shirley Simeoli vs Meg Sheffield / Caroline Ritchie3-6, 3-6
2025-01-18vs Winter Winner - Deercreek - KurtzLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Matthews / Valencia Oglesby vs Karen Sayre / Tina Schumacher2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Radford / Irene Perazzo vs Stephanie Engelhardt / Jody Layne2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFloris Singletary / Lori Gates vs Alisa Blanchard / Buffy Joyce3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Sampat Choudhary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Margaret Radford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Teresa Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Shirley Simeoli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Floris Singletary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Depiesse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Irene Perazzo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Marlowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Ivers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Valencia Oglesby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sampat Choudhary
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Margaret Radford
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Teresa Matthews
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Shirley Simeoli
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Floris Singletary
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Holly Depiesse
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Irene Perazzo
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Marlowe
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Ivers
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Valencia Oglesby
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.