Teams

capt 4/1 1 40 5 35P 729 VTC-KONKLE 40M 40&O THURS

2022 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT MEN · zz 2022 sem 40 & over men drops

2 players · average NTRP 3.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · zz 2022 sem 40 & over men drops
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1drop 3/31 0P 711733 SCWB-KUROSAWA 45M 40&O AD M000000
2capt 4/1 1 40 5 35P 729 VTC-KONKLE 40M 40&O THURS000000
3drop 4/4 1P 711705 TRAVIS-BIERINGER 35M 40&O WED000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
David Konkle
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Steve Eder
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Konkle
21W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.87
Steve Eder
12W–33L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.