Teams

GTC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs DTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Newman / Jeanne Cahn vs Janice Jensen / Lisa OConnor2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKendra Krauss vs Nancy Alterman6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Sanderson / Lisa Schilling vs Kara Bonanno / Katy Curry1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMeredith Munro / Regina Fontaine vs Kerry Watts / Lara Merriken3-6, 2-6
2023-07-18vs CP BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesMindy Franks / Amy Newman vs Natalie Hirschfeld / Kate Anderson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKendra Krauss vs Lena Capra4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Day / Meredith Munro vs Kim Chen / Amy Meadows1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Cahn / Regina Fontaine vs Allison Bookmyer / Sissel Eckenhausen6-2, 6-1
2023-07-11vs SKY BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Newman / Mindy Franks vs Mimi Pomeranz / Annie Humphrey6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRegina Fontaine vs Kim Riley1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Cahn / Helen Coons vs Jennifer Urbonas / Jane Gonnella3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Day / Jessica Sanderson vs Betsy Barringer / Andrea Sykora6-7, 6-7
2023-06-27vs GTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Schilling / Regina Fontaine vs Leigh Laughlin / Holly Luebker6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarla Bartell / Mindy Franks vs Janessa Jacobsen / Pam Stetson6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeanne Cahn / Helen Coons vs Sarah Grimmer / Stephanie Mcgowan2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-06-20vs GAC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMindy Franks / Amy Newman vs Carrie Raben / Monica Hustead6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKendra Krauss / Helen Coons vs Elizabeth Barnacle / Lynelle Zabel6-2, 4-2
L#3 DoublesMeredith Munro / Amy Day vs Maria Angela Lutterbach / Laura Waldman5-7, 2-6
2023-06-13vs CACM GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesHelen Coons / Carla Bartell vs Lissa Moon / Catherine Corbett1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKendra Krauss vs Nancy Hallowell1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Day / Meredith Munro vs Jennifer Thomas / Robin Ashmore-Guin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Sanderson / Lisa Schilling vs Angie Sanders / Lynn Wylie2-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs CACM GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesMeredith Munro / Amy Day vs Shelly Jones / NATALIE KOONTZ2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHelen Coons vs Kit Demko7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Schilling / Shannon Burke vs Angie Shappell / Julie Bulatovic1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRegina Fontaine / Jessica Sanderson vs Andrea Gordon / Kai Peters1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kendra Krauss
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Helen Coons
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Amy Newman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Jeanne Cahn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Mindy Franks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Amy Day
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Regina Fontaine
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Carla Bartell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Shannon Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Meredith Munro
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Jessica Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Franks + Carla Bartell2448% games+0.6% vs expected
Mindy Franks + Amy Newman131749% games+0.4% vs expected
Shannon Burke + Mindy Franks7644% games−1.8% vs expected
Amy Day + Meredith Munro31538% games−6.2% vs expected
Jeanne Cahn + Amy Day2344% games−9.3% vs expected
Kendra Krauss + Jeanne Cahn314 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Cahn + Jessica Sanderson044 matchesnot enough data
Regina Fontaine + Jessica Sanderson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendra Krauss
37W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Helen Coons
15W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amy Newman
44W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jeanne Cahn
55W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Mindy Franks
72W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Amy Day
35W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Regina Fontaine
56W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.65
4
Carla Bartell
19W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Shannon Burke
40W–71L career · 1 line in 2023
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Meredith Munro
41W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Jessica Sanderson
13W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.