Teams

Fireballs Combo Buckhorn - C. Guido

2025 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-16vs MiraBay Aces - C. ElwellWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Tammy Hohman vs Cynthia Sexton / Carrie Elwell6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Pam Smith vs Mary Flynn / Susan Moreo6-3, 6-4
2025-08-10vs Hills/Carroll/18&Over6.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTammy Hohman / Nicole Kipp vs Kelly Goldberg / Erin Forehand7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Laurie Harrar vs Kristin Baker / Elizabeth Provenzano3-6, 2-6
2025-08-09vs Carrollwood OGs - K. MillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Newsom / Sheryl Schumacher vs Kristin Nail / Ashley Rhattigan2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Hohman / Carol Guido vs Lacy Gregory / Karen Wingard4-6, 4-6
2025-08-02vs HG Sparkles - P. CoteyLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Laurie Harrar vs Gabriella Paul / Jian Sun0-6, 3-6
2025-07-19vs HCC Happy Hitters - R. DiVincentWon 21
W#1 DoublesDionesia Ibanez / Tammy Hohman vs Lisa Lowe / Kristina Jonsson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Pam Smith vs Casey Carefoot / Tina Thomas6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDanielle Cunningham / Sara Newsom vs Melissa Scholz / Renee DiVincent5-7, 6-7
2025-07-12vs AG Summer LOVAs - G. BurkeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheryl Schumacher / Tammy Hohman vs Sylvie Roy / Jody McNamee2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Sara Newsom vs Tracey Tupler / Crystal Shanique Bethel7-6, 6-4
2025-06-28vs Plant City 6.5 Combo - P. SmithWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Tammy Hohman vs Sherri Bornstine / Karen Hogg6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanielle Cunningham / Sara Newsom vs Anne Jensen-McAvoy / Julianna Holbrook6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Krissy Heybroek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Nicole Kipp
published
3.34
Tina Warmbier
published
3.24
Emma Rampone
published
3.21
Dionesia Ibanez
published
3.19
Tammy Hohman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Carol Guido
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Sheryl Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pam Smith
published
2.99
Danielle Cunningham
published 3.5
2.93
2.90
Laurie Harrar
published
2.73
Sara Newsom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Kipp + Krissy Heybroek4167% games+10.3% vs expected
Christina Sullivan + Sara Newsom2738% games+0.1% vs expected
Krissy Heybroek + Sheryl Schumacher16954% games−1.0% vs expected
Pam Smith + Tammy Hohman8749% games−1.8% vs expected
Tammy Hohman + Carol Guido3654% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Schumacher + Carol Guido4347% gamesnot enough data
Krissy Heybroek + Carol Guido314 matchesnot enough data
Sheryl Schumacher + Danielle Cunningham134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Krissy Heybroek
212W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Nicole Kipp
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tina Warmbier
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Emma Rampone
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Dionesia Ibanez
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Tammy Hohman
77W–59L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–215L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Sheryl Schumacher
112W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Pam Smith
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Danielle Cunningham
9W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Christina Sullivan
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Laurie Harrar
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Sara Newsom
83W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.