Teams

Place/HCP/Foothills

2022 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 6.5 Combo Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-14vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Place / Cori Peters vs Maile Kim / Courtney Haan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-13vs LHCC 3Won 10
W#2 DoublesLynne Place / Cori Peters vs Marsha Diamonti / Sandi Horyza6-1, 6-4
2022-10-06vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesNatalie von Allmen / Paula Gettys vs Maile Kim / Ashe-Leigh Brusso4-6, 2-6
2022-10-04vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Meier / Lynne Place vs Mitzi Story / Amy Cody6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-09-29vs LHCC 3Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLynne Place / Cori Peters vs Linda Shuford / Kristine Hutton5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-08vs Gates/CRCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesNatalie von Allmen / Paula Gettys vs Beth Martin / Chapel Davis6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs ShokesFuller/CCC/foothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynne Place / Julie Wilson vs Kelli Schmidt / Sondra Simmons6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNatalie von Allmen / Kelly Miller vs Rhonda Laxton / Elise Wright2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Ellen Stupka
published 4
3.52
Lynne Place
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.24
Margie Henry
published
3.13
Paula Gettys
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Cori Peters
published 3.5
3.00
Chris Summers
published 3
3.00
Jennifer Dufour
published
2.92
Natalie von Allmen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Mindy Sells
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Gettys + Chris Summers5258% games−0.5% vs expected
Paula Gettys + Lynne Place4448% gamesnot enough data
Paula Gettys + Natalie von Allmen3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Stupka
73W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lynne Place
149W–164L career · 11 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Margie Henry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Paula Gettys
75W–119L career · 7 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cori Peters
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Chris Summers
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jennifer Dufour
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Natalie von Allmen
190W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Mindy Sells
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.