Teams

PLEASANTON 40AM3.5C

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-25vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGurupreet Chabda / Vishy Venkitakrishnan vs Ravindra Samson / Narasimha Krishnakumar6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGurupreet Chabda / Rohit Chhabra vs Ramkumar Annasami / Mahesh Vencata7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVamsi Boppudi / Vishy Venkitakrishnan vs Darren Buss / Jeffrey Cannon2-6, 2-6
2023-02-04vs BAY CLUB PL 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGurupreet Chabda / Viswanatha Chittepu vs Muneesh Batra / Crawford Carpenter6-3, 6-1
2023-01-28vs MISSION HILLS 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesNavneet Bhatia / Gurupreet Chabda vs Scott Zhang / David Souza6-3, 6-0
2023-01-21vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesVamsi Boppudi / Viswanatha Chittepu vs Dave McConnell / Sudhish Verma6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesThangavel Duraisamy / Vamsi Boppudi vs Jeffrey Cannon / John Phillips5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGurupreet Chabda vs Darren Buss6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
3.58
Raju Saranga
published
3.57
Navneet Bhatia
published
3.47
Gurupreet Chabda
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.44
Amrish Pantvaidya
published 3.5
3.43
Rohit Chhabra
published
3.40
3.39
Vamsi Boppudi
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.39
Yogesh Vohra
published
Thangavel Duraisamy
published
Venkat Prodhuturi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rohit Chhabra + Amrish Pantvaidya4162% games+16.9% vs expected
Vishy Venkitakrishnan + Amrish Pantvaidya2348% gamesnot enough data
Rohit Chhabra + Gurupreet Chabda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vishy Venkitakrishnan
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.62
Raju Saranga
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Navneet Bhatia
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Gurupreet Chabda
67W–41L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Amrish Pantvaidya
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Rohit Chhabra
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Santhosh Kumar Kuchoor
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
4
Vamsi Boppudi
91W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.39
Yogesh Vohra
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.39
Thangavel Duraisamy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Venkat Prodhuturi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.