Teams

Williams Y - Raithel

2024 Duval Combo 18 & Over -Spring · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-26vs Spring - AldenLost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Anderson / Andy Fricke vs Elias Derke / Sean Buckley3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJason Collins / Charles McGehee vs Troy Patton / Jay Westercamp1-6, 4-6
2024-06-12vs Huguenot - RadelLost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Anderson / Andy Fricke vs Andrew de Jong / Robert Radel3-6, 4-6
2024-06-05vs Jax Golf - BosshartWon 10
W#3 DoublesCort Raithel / Andy Fricke vs Eric Minemier / Michael Bosshart6-1, 7-5
2024-05-29vs Spring - AldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesColson Mcgehee / Charles McGehee vs Kyle Whalen / Eric Gebicke6-3, 7-5
2024-05-22vs Huguenot - RadelLost 01
L#2 DoublesCort Raithel / Chuck King vs Tony Hennies / Ben Landis4-6, 2-6
2024-05-08vs Spring - AldenLost 01
L#1 DoublesCort Raithel / Andy Fricke vs Paul Vergara / Sean Buckley2-6, 1-6
2024-04-24vs Huguenot - RadelLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Collins / Andy Fricke vs Jia Zhu / Robert Radel2-6, 5-7
2024-04-15vs Jax Golf - BosshartWon 10
W#2 DoublesColson Mcgehee / Charles McGehee vs Keegan Knarr / Michael Peters6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Eric Leach
published 4.5
3.83
Cort Raithel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Colson Mcgehee
published 4
3.70
David Reynolds
published 4
3.66
Jesse Rogers
published
3.55
Dan Calvo
published 3.5
3.43
Michael Halusek
published
3.40
Andy Fricke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Charles McGehee
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Patrick Kincaid
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles McGehee + Andy Fricke134 matchesnot enough data
Charles McGehee + Cort Raithel123 matchesnot enough data
Cort Raithel + Andy Fricke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Leach
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Cort Raithel
173W–130L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Colson Mcgehee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Reynolds
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Jesse Rogers
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Dan Calvo
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Michael Halusek
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Andy Fricke
106W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Charles McGehee
46W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Kincaid
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.