Teams

BC-Kramer/SarahPucci

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Onwilasinee Stern
published
3.33
Hailey Denenberg
published
3.22
Stacey Derr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Renee Royles
published
3.03
Regina Enriquez
published
3.02
Katya Rodriguez
published
3.00
Nadine Wong
published
2.93
Kelly Kim
published
Alexandra Traut
published 3
Denise Kelley
published 3
2.74
Laura Malandrino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
2.73
Vi Schwartz
published
2.70
2.62
Jill Medawar
published
2.55
Gina Brady
published
2.55
Meagan Patterson
published
2.23
Sarah Pucci
published
Grace Coopman
published
Grace Drawer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jennifer Pucher
published
Marcia Augsburger
published
Monica Baier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Malandrino + Stacey Derr9263% games+8.9% vs expected
Nadine Wong + Kelly Kim7364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Onwilasinee Stern
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Hailey Denenberg
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Stacey Derr
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Renee Royles
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Regina Enriquez
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Katya Rodriguez
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Nadine Wong
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kelly Kim
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Alexandra Traut
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Denise Kelley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Malandrino
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chrissy Karasavas
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Vi Schwartz
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Clara Inciso-Brevig
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Jill Medawar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Gina Brady
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Meagan Patterson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Sarah Pucci
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.23
Grace Coopman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Grace Drawer
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Pucher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Augsburger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Baier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.