Teams

MARION/Greer/40&Over3.0M

2023 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult Men 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-06vs FK -Santiago's Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Ryals / Chaya Jollu vs Guy REYHERME / Rubin Crespo6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTimothy Roberson / Dwayne Molock vs Richard Wu / Lionel D Gill6-1, 6-4
2023-05-28vs FK -Santiago's Serve AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaya Jollu / Tyler Jones vs David Charlip / Bruce Smith7-6, 6-3
2023-05-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesChris Vorisek / Chaya Jollu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-10vs FK -Santiago's Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 SinglesChaya Jollu vs Rubin Crespo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDwayne Molock / Ron Quinn vs Craig Millsaps / Lionel D Gill6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-03vs FK -Santiago's Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Ryals / Chaya Jollu vs John LaFave / Matthew Sarisky6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDwayne Molock / Timothy Roberson vs Jayms McClure / Richard Wu6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Men 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Gary Greer
published 3.5
3.37
Venkat Veerapaneni
published
3.25
George Ryals
published 3.5
2.97
Cuppy Steven
published 3
2.94
Chaya Jollu
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.80
Dwayne Molock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Chris Vorisek
published 3
2.75
David Hollnagel
published 3
Rick Durham
published
Ron Quinn
published
Timothy Roberson
published
Tyler Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Jones + Venkat Veerapaneni303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Greer
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Venkat Veerapaneni
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
George Ryals
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Cuppy Steven
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Chaya Jollu
104W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Dwayne Molock
74W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Chris Vorisek
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
3
David Hollnagel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Rick Durham
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ron Quinn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Roberson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyler Jones
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.