Teams

LCTA65/Garvan/Maybank

Other Mixed Doubles 65 & Over Adult · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-30vs LCTA65/Matros-Hough/AELost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Laskowski / Catherine Kannenberg vs Eric Sappol / Jill Ross2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBob Tamietti / Susan Hardy vs Abby Abrego / Gene Meador6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGeorge Neill / Margaret Dawson vs Frederick Matros / Diane Pastorius4-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs LCTA65/Holmes/MPRLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Hardy / Bob Tamietti vs Leon Geller / Faye MacKall0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHoward Chambers / Frances Bath vs Linder Laffitte / Daryl Bishop3-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs LCTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Jones)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Laskowski / Terri Nobleman vs Matthew Ellman / Susan Whitfield0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hardy / Bob Tamietti vs Deborah McFann / David Hubbard4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Pugh / Amy Jenkins vs Elaine Cechak / Christopher Cechak6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-09vs LCTA65/Matros-Hough/AELost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Tamietti / Amy Jenkins vs Eric Sappol / Jill Ross2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Pugh / Susan Hardy vs Roque Urena / Melanie Ivonowski7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHoward Chambers / Terri Nobleman vs Gene Meador / Lynn Meador1-6, 5-7
2026-06-02vs LCTA65/Holmes/MPRLost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Garvan / Margaret Dawson vs Sandy Andrews / John Mahoney3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Pugh / Susan Hardy vs Hollis Barbaro / Dennis Rossello1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge Neill / Catherine Kannenberg vs Daryl Bishop / Mary Young7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs LCTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Jones)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFrances Bath / Steven Pugh vs Hank Adorno / Elisabeth Parkinson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Laskowski / Mary Davis vs Matthew Ellman / Christiane Jones4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBob Tamietti / Catherine Kannenberg vs Ron Magnuson / Elaine Cechak6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-19vs LCTA65/Matros-Hough/AEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Jenkins / Greg Garvan vs Brian Hough / Lynn Meador6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFrances Bath / Mark Laskowski vs Jill Ross / Eric Sappol2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMike Kresloff / Susan Hardy vs Abby Abrego / Gene Meador6-1, 6-2
2026-05-14vs LCTA65/Holmes/MPRLost 02
L#2 DoublesBob Tamietti / Susan Hardy vs Mary Young / Dennis Rossello7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Pugh / Terri Nobleman vs Hollis Barbaro / John Baiardi1-6, 0-6
2026-05-08vs LCTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Jones)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFrances Bath / Mark Laskowski vs Hank Adorno / Susan Whitfield4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Garvan / Amy Jenkins vs Holly Bates / William Lark6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGeorge Neill / Karen Belanger vs David Hubbard / Elisabeth Parkinson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA (A) 3.5M 65 & Over (Jones)8120721202
2LCTA65/Holmes/MPR7219821184
3LCTA65/Matros-Hough/AE2791839271
4LCTA65/Garvan/Maybank1862143286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Greg Garvan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Catherine Kannenberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Bob Tamietti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Mark Laskowski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Gloria Prindle
published 3
3.00
Margaret Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Frances Bath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bernard Mcfadden
published 3
2.68
George Neill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Howard Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Belanger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Kresloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Pugh
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Terri Nobleman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Laskowski + Frances Bath033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Greg Garvan
33W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Catherine Kannenberg
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bob Tamietti
3W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Mark Laskowski
13W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Gloria Prindle
29W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Margaret Dawson
41W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Frances Bath
31W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Bernard Mcfadden
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
George Neill
6W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Howard Chambers
9W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43
Karen Belanger
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mike Kresloff
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Steven Pugh
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Nobleman
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.