Teams

8 Magnolia Green Winters

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMolly Palenski / Lauren Bale vs Sarah Walter / Abbey Wallace7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKeri Biggins / Samantha Petrich vs Bianca Nunes / Tessica Crampton2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeata Ksionski / Rachel Sheldon vs Lauren Kaplan / Kk Alloway7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-09-10vs 9 HCC Thompson - CoatesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Bale / Kayla Bosman vs Amy Coates / Alex Mendez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Jimenez / Katie McKenney vs Jessica Joyce / Meghan Hale4-6, 1-6
2025-09-03vs 3 ACAC Kelsey/DavisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Bale / Kayla Bosman vs Jean Davis / Betsy Civilette6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Winters / Keri Biggins vs Elizabeth Clark / Mary Follis6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRachel Sheldon / Beata Ksionski vs Julia Preusser / Taryn Adkins7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs 12 Westwood Tri Hards - ManciniLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Palenski / Rochelle Preston vs Lauren King / Jamie McLeod1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKeri Biggins / Samantha Petrich vs Amelia Lovette / Nicole Deiorio2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Jimenez / Beata Ksionski vs Deborah Mancini / Fenton Crowther6-2, 7-6
2025-08-11vs 4 Ridgetop Pugh Tri-levelLost 12
L#1 DoublesRochelle Preston / Kayla Bosman vs Lindsey Scammell / Beth Stafford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Palenski / Natalie Winters vs Martha Prideaux / Nellie Blair6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Jimenez / Katie McKenney vs Cindy Sharp / Amanda Carr6-3, 6-4
2025-07-23vs 2 KRA Daniel-HussWon 30
W#1 DoublesRochelle Preston / Molly Palenski vs Wendy Daniel / Bridgit Kreutzer7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeri Biggins / Natalie Winters vs Louise Bald / Cheryl Ware6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Sheldon / Katie McKenney vs Stacey Hill / Virginia Kaufmann6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Lauren Bale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Rochelle Preston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Beata Ksionski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.51
Rachel Sheldon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Samantha Petrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Jimenez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie McKenney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kayla Bosman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Keri Biggins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Palenski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Natalie Winters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Sheldon + Keri Biggins134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Sheldon + Beata Ksionski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Bale
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Rochelle Preston
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
2.5
Beata Ksionski
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Rachel Sheldon
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Samantha Petrich
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Katherine Jimenez
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie McKenney
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Bosman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keri Biggins
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Palenski
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Winters
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.