Teams

BC-PVTC/KarenKredel

2023 MIXED 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 9.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Jennifer Beindorf
published
4.57
4.49
Erica Smalley
published 4.5
4.31
Andrew Chekian
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Ashley Saccoccio
published 4.5
4.22
Joshua Chou
published
4.17
Kurt Kredel
published
4.16
Mayu Kawamura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Scottie Tucker
published
4.12
Michelle Dean
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.97
Melanie Archer
published
3.86
Kelly Kenney
published
3.84
Peter Malishka
published
3.82
Erin Fiorito
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Karen Kredel
published 4
3.40
Robert Mullarkey
published
3.13
Jonathan Lane
published
Jay Gardner
published
Jerome Haig
published
Ken Shoji
published
Nikki Nance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Chekian + Erica Smalley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.61
5
Christopher Kenney
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.57
4.5
Erica Smalley
109W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Andrew Chekian
111W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Ashley Saccoccio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joshua Chou
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Kurt Kredel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Mayu Kawamura
64W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Scottie Tucker
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.13
Michelle Dean
81W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
Melanie Archer
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.97
Kelly Kenney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.86
Peter Malishka
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Erin Fiorito
100W–71L career · 1 line in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Karen Kredel
42W–57L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Robert Mullarkey
48W–59L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
Jonathan Lane
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
Jay Gardner
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerome Haig
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Shoji
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.