Teams

Johnston/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-18vs Fisher/Keallly/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesIrina Miller / Sara White vs Melissa Burton / Paige Patton3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Burk vs Lindsie Witherow6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Bentley / Arlette Eddy vs Mary Katherine Seibels / Kacee McGuigan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTiffy Baur / Joyce Johnson-Carruthers vs Holly Fisher / Brooke Keane1-6, 2-6
2024-11-11vs Cockrel/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarol Connelly / Kristie Wesa vs Glyna Brooks / Kerry Finley6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Burk vs Eleanor McDermott4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTiffy Baur / Joyce Johnson-Carruthers vs Jennifer Bissonnette / Christy Sykes2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Bentley / Irina Miller vs Ruth Harrison / Jennifer Cockrel6-3, 7-5
2024-11-04vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarol Connelly / Sara White vs Laura Vidalakis / Anne Rogers3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Burk vs Kaitlin Flynn7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebbie Jacobs / Cynthia Heard vs Robin Buchanan / Brenda Mudter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoxanne Ellwanger / Arlette Eddy vs Janet McMeen / Patricia Franks1-6, 1-6
2024-10-28vs Hopper/Rose/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesArlette Eddy / Carolyn Freyer vs Kelly Montgomery / Shalini Rose0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Blanchford / Cynthia Heard vs Jenny Stoebner / Kelly Cole1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesIrina Miller / Anne Smith vs Kim Blakley / Stacy Perry2-6, 5-7
2024-10-21vs Severn/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Heard / Melanie Bentley vs Margaret Bramlett / Susan Gaither2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Connelly / Kristie Wesa vs Susan Severn / Beth Watson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIrina Miller / Sara White vs Jodi Atwood / Lidia Zaharcu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-14vs Warren/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesIrina Miller / Anne Smith vs Preeti Arla / Kyli Whitehead1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Ellwanger / Betsy Johnston vs Leslie Willmore / Rebekah Fusco1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLaura Burk vs Katie Warren6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Connelly / Kristie Wesa vs Sara Hampel / Coffi Bell Corbin6-4, 6-2
2024-09-30vs Kingman/Scott/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Freyer / Irina Miller vs Laura Corder / Samantha Reedy4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Jacobs / Joyce Johnson-Carruthers vs Ann Wood / Sara Beth Scott2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesArlette Eddy / Laura Burk vs Kali Geiger / Lindsay LeBreton6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Laura Burk
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.08
Kristie Wesa
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Carol Connelly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Arlette Eddy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Carolyn Freyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cynthia Heard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Debbie Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Irina Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Tiffy Baur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Roxanne Ellwanger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joyce Johnson-Carruthers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melanie Bentley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tonya Blanchford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Connelly + Kristie Wesa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Burk
32W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Kristie Wesa
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Carol Connelly
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Arlette Eddy
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carolyn Freyer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cynthia Heard
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Jacobs
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Irina Miller
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Tiffy Baur
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Roxanne Ellwanger
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
2.29
Joyce Johnson-Carruthers
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Bentley
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tonya Blanchford
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.