Teams

Green-Sicairos

2024 Loudoun Combo · Loudoun Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-04vs HopkinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCecelia Campbell / Nancy Sicairos vs Jeanne Dattilo / Jill Poretz6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesBeth Kaufman / Nancy Sicairos vs Tara Brill / Hilary Cole6-2, 6-1
2024-10-28vs Belmont- DannerWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Plexico / Cecelia Campbell vs Christina Schinner / Donna James6-4, 6-2
2024-10-24vs HopkinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Kaufman / Wendy Beale vs Wendy Hopkins / Tina Woods2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Rasmussen / Erin Green vs Jessica Egenrieder / Jill Holloman6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHolly Rasmussen / Verna Flemming vs Catherine Mitchell / Jen Kaine6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Plexico / Jahki Nielsen vs Hilary Cole / Paula Elmore4-6, 1-6
2024-10-10vs Belmont- DannerWon 20
W#2 DoublesAshley Plexico / Wendy Beale vs Amanda Broadbent / Allison Broadbent6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Gorman / Lisa Zimmerman vs HEATHER HUGHES / Angela Kane6-2, 6-3
2024-10-07vs HopkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Green / Nancy Sicairos vs Jessica Egenrieder / Aldona Petraitis6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Plexico / Susan Velasco vs Jeanne Dattilo / Tina Woods6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErin Kaplan / Holly Rasmussen vs Caroline Mia Lee / Jill Holloman7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesErin Green / Nancy Sicairos vs Wendy Massarelli / Susan Speciale6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Velasco / Ashley Plexico vs Hilary Cole / Tara Brill3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Gorman / Wendy Beale vs Paula Elmore / Jen Kaine6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Erin Green
published 4.5
4.02
Beth Kaufman
published 4
3.99
Nancy Sicairos
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.79
Ashley Plexico
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Erin Gorman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Cecelia Campbell
published 4
3.48
Wendy Beale
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Holly Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Jessica McAllister
published
3.29
Susan Velasco
published
Verna Flemming
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Plexico + Nancy Sicairos44571% games+9.4% vs expected
Susan Velasco + Wendy Beale5065% games+8.8% vs expected
Erin Kaplan + Beth Kaufman20365% games+5.2% vs expected
Erin Green + Nancy Sicairos2446% games−5.4% vs expected
Nancy Sicairos + Holly Rasmussen11262% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Plexico + Holly Rasmussen3248% gamesnot enough data
Erin Gorman + Ashley Plexico213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Beale + Ashley Plexico303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Green
20W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.33
4
Beth Kaufman
42W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
4.5
Nancy Sicairos
367W–75L career · 7 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Ashley Plexico
237W–58L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Erin Gorman
87W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Cecelia Campbell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Wendy Beale
315W–201L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Holly Rasmussen
191W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jessica McAllister
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Susan Velasco
51W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
Verna Flemming
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.