Teams

Net Ninjas

2025 MIAMIDADE Mixed 40 & Over - Spring · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-09vs Miami/Williams/40&over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Gary / Hironao Yazawa vs Gregory Joseph / Beth Story2-6, 0-6
2025-04-04vs Miami/Williams/40&over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAntony van Smith / Barbara Gary vs Beth Story / Oscar Zapata3-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Miami/Williams/40&over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesELIANA BIGAI / Aaron Anthon vs Michelle Wasserman / Federico Molinari4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Gary / Hironao Yazawa vs MARIANA DURANTE / Schubert Sengupta5-7, 1-6
2025-01-31vs Miami/Williams/40&over7.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Andrade / Santiago Anda vs Karen Marshall / Gregory Joseph4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAntony van Smith / Barbara Gary vs Schubert Sengupta / Silvia Quiroga6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEDUARDO RIOS / ELIANA BIGAI vs Beth Story / Oscar Zapata3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
ELIANA BIGAI
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Andrea Andrade
published 3.5
3.31
Santiago Anda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Maria Boord
published
Aaron Anthon
published 3.5
EDUARDO RIOS
published 3.5
3.17
Kristi Atkison
published
3.10
Alix Surbaran
published 3.5
3.01
Sasha Boca
published
2.91
Barbara Gary
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Yolanda Sosa
published
2.74
Maria Albacarys
published
2.73
Antony van Smith
published 3
Marco Malfavon
published
Mark D'Aguilar
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ELIANA BIGAI
138W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Andrea Andrade
38W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Santiago Anda
51W–94L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Maria Boord
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Aaron Anthon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
EDUARDO RIOS
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Atkison
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Alix Surbaran
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Sasha Boca
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Barbara Gary
18W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
Yolanda Sosa
17W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Maria Albacarys
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Antony van Smith
3W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Marco Malfavon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark D'Aguilar
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.