Teams

Ki.Roberts18M2.5

2026 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-26vs Di.King18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeicy Love / Kurt Love vs Grace Poole / Bryce Abernethy2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaggie Svendsen / Christian Felkl vs Darsan Russo / Peter Russo1-6, 2-6
2026-07-19vs Ra.Yasin18MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Paschal / Richard Paschal vs Ashish Meshram / Jeanna Hastie2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Haver / Emmet Clark vs Hogan Ellis / Rachel Kasongo0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKippy Prevoznak / Robert Cenzon vs Roni J. / Lawrence Pollard4-6, 1-6
2026-07-12vs De.Farmer18M2.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPatricia Haver / Kurt Love vs varun nalam / Clarissa McMathis1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKippy Prevoznak / Robert Cenzon vs Brian Graham / Kristine Rosette2-6, 1-6
2026-07-05vs Di.King18MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Svendsen / Richard Paschal vs Amanda Haymore / Jarrod Haymore2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Spoehr / Robert Cenzon vs Ashley Stephenson / Gustavo Conde6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Paschal / Christian Felkl vs Erin Brooks / Lance Shrader1-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs Ra.Yasin18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesChase Lipp / JACKELYN MUNOZ vs William Murphy / Jeanna Hastie1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmmet Clark / Savannah Walters vs Anu Bhagawan / Jeff Jugan1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKippy Prevoznak / Michael Ricketts vs Lawrence Pollard / Ebony Baylis7-6, 6-4
2026-06-14vs De.Farmer18M2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMaggie Svendsen / Robert Cenzon vs Isaias Barajas / Karla Esparza2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Paschal / Jennifer Paschal vs Ryan Osswald / Isabella Stubbs0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristian Felkl / Patricia Haver vs Brian Graham / Clarissa McMathis6-2, 6-3
2026-06-07vs Di.King18MLost 02
L#2 DoublesPatricia Haver / Emmet Clark vs Amanda Haymore / Bryce Abernethy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeicy Love / Kurt Love vs Grace Poole / Nipul Shah2-6, 0-6
2026-05-31vs Ra.Yasin18MLost 12
W#1 DoublesChase Lipp / JACKELYN MUNOZ vs Ashish Meshram / Ebony Baylis6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Cenzon / Maggie Svendsen vs William Murphy / Jeanna Hastie1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Paschal / Jennifer Paschal vs Ricardo Davalos / Katherine Clarida4-6, 1-6
2026-05-24vs De.Farmer18M2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChase Lipp / Deicy Love vs Isaias Barajas / Karla Esparza0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Felkl / Savannah Walters vs varun nalam / Kristine Rosette2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Paschal / Maggie Svendsen vs Ravikumar Perumal / Clarissa McMathis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ra.Yasin18M8120715153
2De.Farmer18M2.57218921188
3Di.King18M36121532232
4Ki.Roberts18M2.50942346295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Deicy Love
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.67
MaryBeth Spoehr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Michael Ricketts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.39
Emmet Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Chase Lipp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
JACKELYN MUNOZ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Patricia Haver
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Christian Felkl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.88
Jennifer Paschal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.68
Savannah Walters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kippy Prevoznak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kurt Love
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maggie Svendsen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Paschal
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Robert Cenzon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Paschal + Richard Paschal033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Deicy Love
55W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
MaryBeth Spoehr
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Michael Ricketts
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Emmet Clark
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Chase Lipp
1W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
JACKELYN MUNOZ
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Patricia Haver
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Christian Felkl
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jennifer Paschal
0W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Savannah Walters
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.68
Kippy Prevoznak
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kurt Love
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Svendsen
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Paschal
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Cenzon
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.