Teams

Whitfield/40/3.5/MD/BREC

2025 BR Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5 BR (40&O) Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-08vs Generes/40/3.5/MD/CCLAWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Cook / Jess Cook vs Kevin Dibenedetto / Jessica Cuba6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSJ Guercio / Hollie Easterling vs Dean Duplechin / Heather Bush6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIlan Oshri / Jennifer Tolbert vs Brian Leonard / Tricia Bruno6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-13vs Generes/40/3.5/MD/CCLALost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Beecham / Wilbert Whitfield vs Heather Bush / Dean Duplechin3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fairchild / Jerome Skrandel vs Tricia Bruno / David Mathies6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Smith / Phillip Barker vs Alletia Sellers / Madison Mulkey4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (40&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Britney Temple
published 4
3.43
Ilan Oshri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Hollie Easterling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Jess Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Jerome Skrandel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Laura Frost
published
3.27
SJ Guercio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Fairchild
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Joseph McCoy
published
3.19
Megan Beecham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Fiona Conroy
published
3.13
Shona McCoy
published
2.97
Wilbert Whitfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Phillip Barker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Tolbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SJ Guercio + Hollie Easterling5158% games+6.5% vs expected
Jess Cook + Patrick Cook7358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Britney Temple
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Ilan Oshri
44W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Hollie Easterling
39W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jess Cook
34W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jerome Skrandel
25W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Laura Frost
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
SJ Guercio
22W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Fairchild
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joseph McCoy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Megan Beecham
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Fiona Conroy
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Shona McCoy
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Wilbert Whitfield
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
Phillip Barker
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Jennifer Tolbert
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Cook
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.