Teams

Team 2 Grace’s Aces

2023 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-17vs Team 1 Wise Ace GOATsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargarita Baldwin / Rohan Wadehra vs Aisha Bhimla / Kenneth Fowler6-2, 6-3
2023-01-28vs Team 4 Pro Penn 1Won 10
W#2 DoublesCamryn Kim / RICARDO DURAN vs John Pennington / Kelsey Semrod6-2, 6-4
2023-01-18vs Team 3 Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Lee / RICARDO DURAN vs Caitlin Young / Rob Rivera7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMargarita Baldwin / Manu Balasubramanian vs Vanessa Ogilvie / Chris Ford6-1, 6-1
2023-01-15vs Team 4 Pro Penn 1Won 10
W#2 DoublesPatrick Hughes / Margarita Baldwin vs Heather Carr / Jan Neumann6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
4.77
Diego Hatem
published 5
Ashley Xie
published 5
4.56
Landon Schaefer
published
4.52
Caitlin Lee
published 4.5
4.49
Leah Noonan
published
4.45
Rohan Wadehra
published
4.38
Jenna Hagood
published
4.36
Nicholas McMurray
published 4.5
4.35
RICARDO DURAN
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Rory Smith
published
4.16
Jonathan Santos
published
3.99
Margarita Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Camryn Kim
published 4
Jordan Heitzner
published
Karen Taubenslag
published
Patrick Hughes
published
William McDevitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Hughes + Jenna Hagood404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Manu Balasubramanian
41W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.87
5
Diego Hatem
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.77
5
Ashley Xie
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Landon Schaefer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.56
4.5
Caitlin Lee
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.52
Leah Noonan
50W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
4.49
Rohan Wadehra
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
4.45
Jenna Hagood
45W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Nicholas McMurray
175W–74L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
RICARDO DURAN
102W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
4.35
Rory Smith
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.28
Jonathan Santos
74W–27L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Margarita Baldwin
449W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Camryn Kim
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jordan Heitzner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Taubenslag
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patrick Hughes
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William McDevitt
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.