Teams

Team 4 Team Tisch

2026 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-02vs Team 2 FDPLost 12
L#1 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Mei Xue / George Liu2-6, 3-5
L#2 DoublesChristopher Hernandez / Ashley Papageorge vs Qing Lin / Justin Yao1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Hancock / William Hancock vs Qun Bi / Xin Geng6-2, 6-1
2026-03-27vs Team 1 CrenshawLost 02
L#1 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Mark Shen / Julie Morris1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Papageorge / Jim Wiseman vs Mike Metzger / Meagan Metzger6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Hancock / Andrew Huling vs Gabrielle Guillen / Chris Ford4-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Evans / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Josh Snead / Cheryl Danner1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Hernandez / Ashley Papageorge vs John Williamson / Erica Smedberg3-6, 0-6
2026-03-19vs Team 12 KoLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Papageorge / Christopher Hernandez vs Cory Brown / Eric Nguyen1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatie Cummings / Robert Evans vs Hisayo Harlan / Benoit Kroely7-6, 1-3
W#3 DoublesMona Cedo / Andrew Huling vs Hanlun Song / Sherra Dung6-4, 5-5
2026-03-15vs Team 6 Net Ninjas 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesMona Cedo / Andrew Huling vs Joe Valdez / Nellie Jafari6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Hancock / Mary Tisch vs Michael Phannareth / Beverly Zou6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJim Wiseman / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Ran Huang / Monica Palacios6-4, 2-6
2026-02-14vs Team 8 Mad Ranchers 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTariq Haddad / Mona Cedo vs Andrew Wanamaker / Effie Hoffman3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Hancock / Barbara Hancock vs SHANE MURRAY / Danielle Frazier6-7, 4-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Evans / Mary Tisch vs William Weng / Elizabeth Solander3-6, 0-6
2026-02-09vs Team 11 RBCC 7.0 MixedLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Tisch / Eyad Abuhamda vs Andrea Henningsen / David Tolley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTariq Haddad / Barbara Hancock vs Lisa Tolley / Michael Oakes6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJim Wiseman / Catie Cummings vs John DeMoors / Tammy Schulman2-6, 2-6
2026-01-16vs Team 13 Ace BreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesTariq Haddad / Mona Cedo vs Brian Colan / Yulan Jin1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Ivan Kozliak / Xiaoli Liang7-6, 3-2
L#3 DoublesChristopher Hernandez / Ashley Papageorge vs Scott Jacob / Junhui Liu0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 12 Ko8020412150
2Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 187119512160
3Team 8 Mad Ranchers 7.053141021188
4Team 3 Hopkins-Sultan44111329211
5Team 13 Ace Breakers35121226201
6Team 5 Causing a Racquet 7.035101430231
7Team 11 RBCC 7.0 Mixed3591531234
8Team 6 Net Ninjas 7.03571735242
9Team 4 Team Tisch1771733239
10Team 7 Topspin Riot1742040256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Mona Cedo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.69
Eyad Abuhamda
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
Tariq Haddad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Barbara Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Ashley Papageorge
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Catie Cummings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Mary Tisch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Jim Wiseman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Andrew Huling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Robert Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Christopher Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Evans + Mary Tisch7944% gamesnot enough data
Catie Cummings + Robert Evans134 matchesnot enough data
Eyad Abuhamda + Ingrid Hunsicker224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Tisch + Tariq Haddad134 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Papageorge + Christopher Hernandez044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mona Cedo
63W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.70
4
Eyad Abuhamda
141W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Tariq Haddad
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Hancock
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Ashley Papageorge
25W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Catie Cummings
59W–105L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Mary Tisch
71W–105L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
111W–174L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Jim Wiseman
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Andrew Huling
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Robert Evans
30W–53L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Christopher Hernandez
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.