Teams

BC-ElSegundo/RieMiyake

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-14vs BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolffWon 10
W#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Lynn Attig / Janis Urich-Vasconez6-3, 6-2
2021-10-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Erika Kemple / Jennifer Cohn3-6, 1-6
2021-09-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Michelle Lanterman vs Sonja Farmer / Vanessa Mendez3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Yoko Ishizuka
published
3.61
Rie Miyake
published
3.46
Sue Bingham
published
3.36
Betty Torng
published 3.5
3.35
Michelle Lanterman
published
3.29
Belmarie Huynh
published 3.5
3.10
Kathy Inouye
published
3.05
Fanita Kuljis
published 3.5
2.98
Naoko Mizuta
published
2.96
Mary Ann Foard
published
2.95
Koko King
published
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Tina Jackson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yoko Ishizuka
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Rie Miyake
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.61
Sue Bingham
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Betty Torng
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
Michelle Lanterman
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Belmarie Huynh
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Kathy Inouye
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Fanita Kuljis
1W–9L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
Naoko Mizuta
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
2.98
Mary Ann Foard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.96
Koko King
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Karie Lanterman
137W–186L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Tina Jackson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.