Teams

CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 3.Wheaton Isphording Sat 2 $20

CDTA 2Fall Combo Mixed · CDTA F Combo Mix 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesKristin Adams / David Isphording vs Margaux Teegarden-Downs / Michael Chan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Dallianis / Kevin Onorato vs William Buklis / Nicole Corrigan4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBrian Green / Megan Dallianis vs Yoshitaka Nakahara / Yukiko Juretic6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesOrville Ankarlo / Kristin Adams vs Brian Abbott / Barbara Chmieleski2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRoss MacNeill / Marilyn Tansey vs Charlie Turri / Cecilia Lauterbach5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJoan Labue / Matt Lorentsen vs Bradford Matson / Alicia Arrick6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Onorato / Stephanie Dixon vs Sheila Spade / Alan Gerali2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Lee / Jorge Valdez vs Felix Frayman / Amy Carr6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesBrian Green / Megan Dallianis vs Igor Gogov / Alia Zander7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKevin Onorato / Marilyn Tansey vs Haina Shin / Chen Cheng3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Lee / Kevin Onorato vs Shelley Young / Michael Denne6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesBrian Green / Leigh Champagne vs Elleson Song / Ali Amer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Dixon / Kevin Onorato vs Brian Toba / Nancy Valerio6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLeigh Champagne / Kevin Onorato vs Stephanie Remelius / Thomas Strickler6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDavid Isphording / Joan Labue vs Dennis Tysl / GERELMAA BUDMANDAKH5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJorge Valdez / Marilyn Tansey vs Mark Rawlins / Jamie Gorey7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDavid Isphording / Kristin Adams vs Derek Majka / Tracy Merrell4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesOrville Ankarlo / Megan Dallianis vs James Klein / Iva Gregorova3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJorge Valdez / Stephanie Dixon vs Joseph Lyden / Laurie Sandman4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · CDTA F Combo Mix 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 4.Glenbrook Tysl Sun 9 $258122515176
2CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 8.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 5 $207219821170
3CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 1.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $2254171021195
4CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 7.Schaumburg Hayashida Sun 3 $1854161125209
5CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 2.MT Bann Leyderman Sun 10 $2554161127239
6CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 3.Wheaton Isphording Sat 2 $2054141332234
7CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 10.River Trails Miller Sat 7 $2245121534240
8CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 5.Homewood Denne Sat 10 $2036101736240
9CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 9.Centennial Spade Sat 3 $203691840280
10CDTA F ComboMixX7.5 6.Tam Duffy Sat 5 $220902754321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Marilyn Tansey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Brian Green
published 4
3.67
Leigh Champagne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
David Isphording
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Matt Lorentsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Julie Rusin
published
3.55
Ross MacNeill
published
3.54
Jorge Valdez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Joan Labue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Orville Ankarlo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christopher Garcia
published
Jason Richardson
published
Kevin Onorato
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Megan Dallianis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Dixon + Kevin Onorato123 matchesnot enough data
Joan Labue + David Isphording123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Rusin + Brian Green123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marilyn Tansey
216W–144L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Brian Green
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Champagne
65W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.67
4
David Isphording
105W–129L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Matt Lorentsen
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Julie Rusin
59W–24L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Ross MacNeill
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jorge Valdez
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Joan Labue
27W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Orville Ankarlo
76W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Christopher Garcia
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Richardson
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Onorato
32W–19L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Dallianis
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Dixon
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.