Teams

MEMPK SCOTT

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs PBCP BARNHILLLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Michelle Cauthon / Ana Bhagat4-6, 0-6
2023-05-22vs LTFCS SKINNERWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Nancy Thompson / Tiffany Coles6-4, 7-6
2023-05-15vs CCOC BONICELLILost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Jenisha Bonicelli / Anne Janda6-7, 3-6
2023-05-08vs CSRC POULINWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Patricia Poulin / Noel Kelly6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-01vs GOG KREPSWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Self / Susan Shaink vs Roseann Engelage / Teresa Kreps7-6, 6-1
2023-04-24vs PBCP BARNHILLLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Self / Susan Shaink vs Ana Bhagat / Michelle Cauthon1-6, 3-6
2023-04-17vs LTFCS SKINNERWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaink / Heidi Williams vs Amy CLARK / Susan Skinner6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Scott
published 3.5
3.21
Miyo Park
published
2.96
Susan Shaink
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.89
Stacey Self
published
2.79
Mary Evilsizer
published
Anne Sims
published 3
2.70
Jami Cipriani
published
2.67
Tiffany Freel
published
2.54
Beatriz Arsuaga
published 3
2.44
Teresa Vieira
published
Amanda Tiffany
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Evilsizer + Beatriz Arsuaga314 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Self + Teresa Vieira123 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Freel + Beatriz Arsuaga213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Scott
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Miyo Park
30W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Susan Shaink
114W–57L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Stacey Self
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Mary Evilsizer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Anne Sims
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jami Cipriani
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70
Tiffany Freel
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Beatriz Arsuaga
15W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
Teresa Vieira
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Amanda Tiffany
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.