Teams

ELW Ankney

2023 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Summer · 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-10vs Pinellas/Halm/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Hollingsworth / Dane Houston vs Ashton Fritz / Jonathan Mellen5-7, 3-6
2023-08-27vs Pinellas/Halm/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesHarold Smart / Dane Houston vs Ashton Fritz / Felix Herrera3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Ankney / Michael Issa vs Brandon Halm / Garrett Prochaska6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-27vs Seminole Lake Dsa TriLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Issa / Charles Ankney vs Jose Dsa / David Ponraj6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-11vs Seminole Lake Dsa TriLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Hollingsworth / Dane Houston vs Jose Jarabo / Erik Breitenbach5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Issa / Charles Ankney vs David Ponraj / Peter Martino5-7, 5-7
2023-08-06vs Seminole Lake Dsa TriWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Hill / Charles Ankney vs Jose Dsa / Peter Martino7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-07-30vs Pinellas/Halm/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Christopher Hollingsworth vs Ashton Fritz / Felix Herrera2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesChristopher Hollingsworth / Richard Helme vs Felix Herrera / Ashton Fritz6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Christopher Hollingsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Richard Helme
published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Michael Issa
published
3.08
Gregg Stallwood
published 3.5
3.00
Charles Ankney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.74
Ben Coughanour
published 3
2.73
Greg Cucchi
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dane Houston + Christopher Hollingsworth033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Hollingsworth
141W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Richard Helme
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Michael Issa
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Gregg Stallwood
2W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Charles Ankney
53W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Ben Coughanour
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Greg Cucchi
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.