Teams

Hidden Hills - Moe

2021 Duval Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-17vs Duval - Eagle Harbor - HamelSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeff Darnall / Michelle Jahn vs Kraig Hamel / Jolene Hamel7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTami Moe / William Jahn vs Nancy Wentz / Lucian Lawley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-12vs Duval - Eagle Harbor - HamelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Francis Raftery / Arlene Muehl vs Matt Hutto / Sheryl Phillips6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Griffith / Michelle Jahn vs Jana Nebrat / Kraig Hamel1-6, 4-6
2021-07-29vs Duval - Eagle Harbor - HamelWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Michael Griffith vs Nancy Wentz / Matt Hutto6-4, 6-1
2021-07-15vs Duval - Eagle Harbor - HamelLost 02
L#1 DoublesArlene Muehl / John Francis Raftery vs Sheryl Phillips / Walter Rios3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTami Moe / William Jahn vs Kandee Townsend / Larry Townsend4-6, 4-6
2021-07-08vs Duval - Eagle Harbor - HamelWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Francis Raftery / Arlene Muehl vs Gregory Sapp / Nancy Wentz6-1, 6-3
2021-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Griffith / Michelle Jahn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-17vs Duval - Eagle Harbor - HamelLost 02
L#2 DoublesArlene Muehl / John Francis Raftery vs Nancy Wentz / Matt Hutto4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Jahn / Annette Mattiace vs Jolene Hamel / Gregory Sapp5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Bradley Moe
published 4
3.46
Arlene Muehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Michelle Jahn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jeff Darnall
published
John Francis Raftery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Griffith
published
William Jahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Francis Raftery + Arlene Muehl221453% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Jahn + William Jahn4357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bradley Moe
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Arlene Muehl
77W–66L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michelle Jahn
68W–143L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jeff Darnall
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Francis Raftery
79W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Griffith
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
William Jahn
24W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.