Teams

Violette - Hidden Dunes

2026 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-12vs Bachman - Rosemary BeachLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Barbe / Brad Marshall vs Nick Afuta / Robert Abbott7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRichard Cole vs Hari Prasad2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWalter Hutt / Matthew Schenk vs Derek Cotton / Brandon Bachman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Fox / Stephen Varian vs Travis Sykes / Brad Brown4-6, 3-6
2026-03-29vs Bachman - Rosemary BeachWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Schenk / Walter Hutt vs Travis Sykes / Robert DeMars6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMark Violette / Justin Fox vs Byron Cotton / Brandon Bachman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Varian / Chris Barbe vs Todd Zaborski / Rusty Butcher6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-22vs Bachman - Rosemary BeachLost 03
L#1 DoublesJay Coppic / Stephen Varian vs Christopher Moore / John Hooks3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChris Barbe vs Nick Afuta1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Violette / Justin Fox vs Robert Abbott / Hari Prasad3-6, 2-6
2026-03-15vs Bachman - Rosemary BeachSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChris Barbe / Stephen Varian vs Tommy Zaner / John Sherrod6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Violette / Richard Cole vs Robert DeMars / Bart Salim1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Daniel Brigman
published 4.5
3.98
Henry Bonar
published
3.88
Chris Barbe
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.82
Matthew Schenk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Stephen Varian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Mark Violette
published
3.60
Chun Chen
published 4
3.57
Justin Fox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Cole
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Walter Hutt
published
William Grigsby
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Brigman
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Henry Bonar
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Chris Barbe
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Matthew Schenk
63W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Stephen Varian
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Mark Violette
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Chun Chen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Justin Fox
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
Richard Cole
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Walter Hutt
13W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Grigsby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.