Teams

4-MMiller-CHTC

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-29vs 1-MLong-ENO-18+ 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Wood / Sarah DeVore vs Sarah Mills / Kimberly Lamm6-0, 6-0
2022-09-27vs 8-CIrish - ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Farber / Sarah DeVore vs Tammy Bradley / Emily Yang6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-20vs 2-ECurry-SVCWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Sarah DeVore vs Laura Caldwell / Rachel Sendor6-3, 6-1
2022-09-15vs 3-KDonica-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Sarah Towles vs Laura Williams / Abby Olmsted3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-30vs 9-JYurkovich-HVFWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Christina Deprez vs Eleanor Neilson / Joselyn McDonald6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Sarah Ederle vs MacKenzie Gokey / Michelle Ritchie6-1, 6-0
2022-08-23vs 6-SBrogden-Eno- 18+ 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Farber / Sarah DeVore vs Laurie Keilholz / Tanya Barcinas6-1, 6-3
2022-08-16vs 7-AYoung-EVWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Christina Deprez vs Kellie Johnson / Emily Ryan6-2, 6-1
2022-08-04vs 5-MSanchez-Eno-18 6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Sarah Ederle vs Kolleen Fitzgerald / Karli Eller6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMindy Miller / Sarah DeVore vs Cindy Bohlin / Kathryn Kabat7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4.5
3.90
Brook Holton Sheahan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.60
Noreen McDonald
published
3.21
Sarah DeVore
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Regina Davis
published
3.13
Lynne Farber
published
3.11
Sarah Ederle
published
3.08
Mindy Miller
published
2.81
Sarah Towles
published
2.52
Christina Deprez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Ederle + Mindy Miller134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 13 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Brook Holton Sheahan
217W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Noreen McDonald
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sarah DeVore
66W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Regina Davis
36W–56L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Lynne Farber
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Sarah Ederle
39W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.11
Mindy Miller
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
Sarah Towles
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Christina Deprez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.