Teams

Lahaina Lobsters

2025 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-22vs Magnetar'sLost 14
L#1 DoublesDianna Garnes / Christine Ho vs Tesha Newman / Eveline Wunder1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Bowie vs Amanda Tillson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Houlne / Heidi Pennink vs Diane Chaves / Lore Lee Robello3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON / Barbara Skaggs vs Clarita Balala / Trudi Vierra2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesKari Alexander / Nancy Cross vs Bichha Kato / Catherine Pham6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Magnetar'sLost 14
L#1 DoublesHeidi Pennink / Christine Ho vs Amanda Tillson / Karla Nutt1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDianna Garnes vs Gina Teliho3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Cross / Barbara Skaggs vs Trudi Vierra / Pamela Henry2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLea Williams-Doherty / Kari Alexander vs Clarita Balala / Lore Lee Robello4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLuly Baker / JOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON vs Tesha Newman / Catherine Pham4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Magnetar's8033722263
2MCC Wahines44192148378
3Lahaina Lobsters44182254398
4Wailea 9 Lives26152555397
5Mike's 3.5W26152559410

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Katy O'Leary
published
3.37
Lea Williams-Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Rebecca Bowie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Celeste Abate
published 3.5
3.14
Dianna Garnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Barbara Skaggs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Alice Koniges
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Kari Alexander
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Christine Ho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Kim Houlne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Pennink
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
JOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Luly Baker
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Cross
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Alexander + JOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON1452% games+4.3% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Barbara Skaggs17853% games+1.5% vs expected
Kari Alexander + Barbara Skaggs3744% games−2.5% vs expected
Celeste Abate + Lea Williams-Doherty5450% games−2.8% vs expected
Dianna Garnes + Lea Williams-Doherty134 matchesnot enough data
JOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON + Luly Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy O'Leary
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Lea Williams-Doherty
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Rebecca Bowie
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Celeste Abate
24W–36L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Dianna Garnes
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Barbara Skaggs
49W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Alice Koniges
14W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kari Alexander
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Christine Ho
13W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Kim Houlne
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Heidi Pennink
6W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
JOYCE ANNE BUSTILLOS-OHANLON
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luly Baker
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Cross
25W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.