Teams

*6-SLlewellyn-ENO-4.5

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend

10 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-18vs *3-JByrd-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Jackson Naftel0-6, 3-6
2024-04-27vs *4-KMoyung-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAl Pick / Spencer Llewellyn vs Patrick Grant / Raymond Xu6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-20vs *7-SNarayan-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Matt Piland6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAl Pick / Andrew Pham vs Jake Wolfe / Scott Benson1-6, 5-7
2024-04-13vs *2-RBerliner-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAl Pick / Andrew Pham vs Sergii Porokh / Luc Sanchez6-1, 7-6
2024-04-06vs *8-RMcClenny-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Clark / Spencer Llewellyn vs Richard McClenny / William Boyette7-6, 6-3
2024-03-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Clark / Al Pick vs Lawrence Herst / Charles Wood6-4, 6-3
2024-03-16vs *5-MHanauer-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Zack Czajkowski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAl Pick / William Clark vs Jeron Russell / Jackson Cabell7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Rawle Sue-Ho
published
4.31
Tyler Carroll
published
4.28
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Al Pick
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Alejandro Fernandez
published 4.5
3.82
Juan Andrade
published
Jake Ortiz
published 4
3.66
Arun Manikumar
published 4
3.39
Ivan Ross
published 3.5
Robert Beier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Carroll + Rawle Sue-Ho10065% games+9.1% vs expected
Spencer Llewellyn + Rawle Sue-Ho303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rawle Sue-Ho
24W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
231W–157L career · 12 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Al Pick
75W–60L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
4.5
Alejandro Fernandez
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.88
Juan Andrade
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Jake Ortiz
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Arun Manikumar
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Ivan Ross
17W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
Robert Beier
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.