Teams

GB:Lafreniere:Malone

2023 NH Adult 40 & Over Women Day · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesMary Lafreniere / Angela Carter vs Wendy Poulin / Katherine McDonnell6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGretchen Hagen vs Michelle Samdperil6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaurel Erickson / Christina King vs Diane Szmyd / Eileen Zimmerman6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynn Russ / Andrea Grenier vs Anne Catell / Sarah Baybutt3-6, 4-6
2023-06-20vs HSB:WeidknechtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLaurel Erickson / Stephanie Bartlett vs Nancy Braese / Susanne Trask6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJen Lader vs Sophie Leigh3-6, 1-4
W#2 DoublesMary Lafreniere / Gretchen Hagen vs ANITA WEIDKNECHT / Tracey Bentley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina King / Patricia Lovejoy vs Christina Cook / Marlow Rahn3-6, 4-6
2023-06-13vs YORK:Macri:PavonaWon 40
W#1 DoublesAngela Carter / Sayre Malone vs Barbara Green / Cinde Vandette6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Jesse Kohler6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGretchen Hagen / Stephanie Bartlett vs Susan MacRi / Souci Rollins6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Kennedy / Patricia Lovejoy vs Anita Alden / Karen Billipp7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAngela Carter / Sayre Malone vs Holly Mills / Eileen Zimmerman6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Michelle Samdperil6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStephanie Bartlett / Gretchen Hagen vs Christie Fujimoto / Kimberly Caron6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Russ / Laurel Erickson vs Heather Maher / Dennett Page3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-30vs HSB:WeidknechtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMary Lafreniere / Laurel Erickson vs Sarah Hill / ANITA WEIDKNECHT4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Sophie Leigh3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStephanie Bartlett / Gretchen Hagen vs Christa Myers / Deborah Weissbard Harrington6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAmy Kennedy / Barbara Carleton vs Olivia Carnevale / Susanne Trask6-7, 4-6
2023-05-23vs YORK:Macri:PavonaLost 13
L#1 DoublesAngela Carter / Gretchen Hagen vs Margaret Galligan / Jennie Chambers6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Maryse Newton7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Carleton / Laurel Erickson vs Anita Alden / Roberta Sullivan6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Lovejoy / Amy Kennedy vs Susan MacRi / Kristan Pavona2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAngela Carter / Mary Lafreniere vs Kimberly Caron / Heather Maher7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Grace Pimental6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Kennedy / Andrea Grenier vs Wendy Poulin / Holly Mills4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBarbara Carleton / Patricia Lovejoy vs Diane Mizusawa / Mary Ellen McNamara4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-09vs HSB:WeidknechtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAngela Carter / Gretchen Hagen vs Christina Cook / Sophie Leigh6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Deborah Weissbard Harrington6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Russ / Barbara Carleton vs Christa Myers / Nancy Braese3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Esposito / Ginger Kraus vs Holly Knox / Susanne Trask1-6, 2-6
2023-05-02vs YORK:Macri:PavonaLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela Carter / Gretchen Hagen vs Jesse Kohler / Roberta Sullivan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEsmerelda Medeiros vs Elyssa DelValle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Carleton / Amy Kennedy vs Regina Lammers / Souci Rollins3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGinger Kraus / Lynn Russ vs Karen Billipp / Kristan Pavona2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HSB:Weidknecht09231332298
2GH:WinniGirls:Joyce:Shegog09231332283
3CON:Krushers:Rauseo:Rados09191737307
4GB:Lafreniere:Malone09191739306
5LNH:RacquetsUp:Bouressa:Ackerman09201640331
6MTS:Donahue:Scharpf09181841324
7YMCA:Howell09201643352
8YMCA:Champoux:Johnson09171944338
9RVC:GoodGollyMIssVolley:Chaltain:Gorman09171946348
10YORK:Macri:Pavona09162048353
11WWCC:SagamoreCreekServiceBreaks:Zimmerman:Porter09142251386

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Angela Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Gretchen Hagen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Amy Kennedy
published 3.5
Andrea Grenier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Barbara Carleton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Christina King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Sayre Malone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Mary Lafreniere
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Esmerelda Medeiros
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Ginger Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.88
Patricia Lovejoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Judy Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jen Lader
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Laurel Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lynn Russ
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stephanie Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Carter + Gretchen Hagen16464% games+8.3% vs expected
Angela Carter + Sayre Malone10264% games+4.6% vs expected
Sayre Malone + Mary Lafreniere11756% games+3.5% vs expected
Angela Carter + Lynn Russ2550% games+2.7% vs expected
Barbara Carleton + Patricia Lovejoy121850% games−0.1% vs expected
Laurel Erickson + Mary Lafreniere6448% games−0.3% vs expected
Stephanie Bartlett + Sayre Malone3247% games−2.9% vs expected
Sayre Malone + Patricia Lovejoy4939% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Carter
88W–39L career · 7 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Gretchen Hagen
84W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Amy Kennedy
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Grenier
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Carleton
53W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christina King
40W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Sayre Malone
50W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Mary Lafreniere
73W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Esmerelda Medeiros
45W–38L career · 7 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Ginger Kraus
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Patricia Lovejoy
61W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.88
Judy Esposito
17W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Jen Lader
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Laurel Erickson
25W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Russ
23W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Bartlett
40W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.