Teams

GSTL55/Himmelsbach/Dunes

2026 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-12vs GSTL55/Oakley/GrandeDunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesGeorgeanne Rice / Kimberly Gore vs Drucilla Kownacki / Isabelle Roy2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatty Gresko / Sandye Hicks vs Shannon Edwards / Elizabeth Fischer4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeri Himmelsbach / Donna Zeglin vs Dayle Oakley / Faith Bowling3-6, 0-6
2026-03-29vs GSTL55/Siembida/WachesawWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatty Gresko / Sandye Hicks vs Jeannine Siembida / Sloan Derrick5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Gore / Catherine Collins vs Jennifer Walsh / Jean Morris6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Zeglin / Jeri Himmelsbach vs Cheryl Haugh / Kim Gordon7-6, 6-2
2026-03-22vs GSTL 3.0W 55 & Over (Phillips)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPatty Gresko / Sandye Hicks vs Theresa Felkel / Melinda Hyman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Collins / Debbie Edmonds vs Nicole Mattingly / Ann McElreath4-6, 1-6
2026-03-15vs GSTL55/Henderson/INDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Sparks / Cheryl Young vs Lynda Carter / Megan Mcdonald7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Collins / Patty Gresko vs Mary Cannon / Kathy Henderson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandye Hicks / Margaret Singleton vs Deana Jowers / Linda Kaminski5-7, 4-6
2026-03-01vs GSTL55/Oakley/GrandeDunesWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatty Gresko / Georgeanne Rice vs Lisa Austin / Isabelle Roy6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMargaret Singleton / Debbie Edmonds vs Shannon Edwards / Elizabeth Fischer1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Zeglin / Jeri Himmelsbach vs Renee Lane / Joni Sappenfield6-2, 7-5
2026-02-22vs GSTL55/Siembida/WachesawWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gore / Debbie Edmonds vs Sloan Derrick / Kim Gordon7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGeorgeanne Rice / Donna Zeglin vs Cheryl Haugh / Jean Morris6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPatty Gresko / Sandye Hicks vs Jeannine Siembida / Maria Johnson5-7, 0-6
2026-02-20vs GSTL 3.0W 55 & Over (Phillips)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gore / Susan Sparks vs Jill Merhar / Barbara Meyer3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatty Gresko / Margaret Singleton vs Debby Brooks / Margaret Phillips6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Edmonds / Georgeanne Rice vs Theresa Felkel / Melinda Hyman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs GSTL55/Henderson/INDLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gore / Georgeanne Rice vs Mary Cannon / Megan Mcdonald6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Zeglin / Jeri Himmelsbach vs Lynda Carter / Denise Talbert6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Edmonds / Sandye Hicks vs Nancy Adamson / Barbara Sullivan6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Kimberly Gore
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Susan Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Patty Gresko
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.72
Georgeanne Rice
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.68
Catherine Collins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Debbie Edmonds
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Margaret Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Donna Zeglin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.62
Jeri Himmelsbach
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Cheryl Young
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Sandye Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgeanne Rice + Debbie Edmonds3347% games+9.2% vs expected
Jeri Himmelsbach + Donna Zeglin3448% games−5.9% vs expected
Patty Gresko + Sandye Hicks1534% games−11.0% vs expected
Georgeanne Rice + Kimberly Gore303 matchesnot enough data
Patty Gresko + Kimberly Gore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Gore
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Susan Sparks
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Patty Gresko
9W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Georgeanne Rice
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Catherine Collins
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Debbie Edmonds
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Margaret Singleton
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
Donna Zeglin
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Jeri Himmelsbach
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Cheryl Young
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Sandye Hicks
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.