← Teams

MiddleStates/Davis/M55&Over9.0

2023 USTA 55 & Over Mx Doubles League · 9.0 Mixed Doubles

7 players · average NTRP 4.30 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-16vs DDWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Bryner / Robert Belser vs Jayne Weinstock / Chengfeng Lou6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rakoczy / Kirk Thoman vs David Steger / Julie Kitze6-3, 6-2
2023-04-16vs NJDWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Belser / Laura Athey vs Andrew Hoffman / Susan Dixon Thompson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Elliott / Bonnie Westheaffer vs Alan Rosenberg / Carol Hammond6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Brink / Patricia Bryner vs Dan McGrath / Diana Natole6-3, 6-0
2023-04-15vs DDWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Tom Brink vs Greg Bosch / Marjorie Wentz2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Davis / Jennifer Rakoczy vs Bertrand Dussert / Julie Kitze4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKirk Thoman / Jayne Snyder vs Hungcheng Chen / Margaret Hamilton6-4, 6-3
2023-04-15vs NJDWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Robert Belser vs Rudolf van Mol / Carol Hammond6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBonnie Westheaffer / Paul Elliott vs Alan Rosenberg / Jill Pancha7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bryner / Tom Brink vs Andrew Hoffman / Amy Fryer6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MiddleStates/Davis/M55&Over9.004111585
2DD044819129
3NJD043919124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Tom Brink
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Paul Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —
4.31
Laura Athey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Kirk Thoman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Jennifer Rakoczy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Bonnie Westheaffer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Robert Belser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Brink + Laura Athey5–260% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tom Brink
249W–144L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
—
Paul Elliott
68W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Laura Athey
124W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Kirk Thoman
150W–147L career · 6 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Jennifer Rakoczy
211W–143L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Bonnie Westheaffer
152W–134L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
—
Robert Belser
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.