Teams

Bridgemill (Woodard 40)

Cherokee Summer - USTA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Weekday Women 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Weekday Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lynne Poirier
published
3.73
Phebe Cohen
published
3.70
Sandra Woodard
published
3.67
Heidi Hill
published
3.63
Claudia Spohner
published 4
3.49
Shannon Stokley
published
3.45
Laura Cross
published
3.45
Sandy Hughes
published
Amy Davidson
published 3.5
Angela Allen
published 3.5
3.21
Elaine Eternod
published
3.15
Eve Tubman
published
3.13
Christie Whittle
published 3.5
Jenny Spain
published
Karyn Haydock
published
Kim Ligon
published
Lori Haigwood
published
Nicole Togliatti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Spohner + Shannon Stokley6253% games+7.8% vs expected
Laura Cross + Elaine Eternod6552% games−4.8% vs expected
Claudia Spohner + Lynne Poirier2347% gamesnot enough data
Laura Cross + Jenny Spain4164% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Spohner + Heidi Hill134 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Woodard + Laura Cross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Poirier
32W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Phebe Cohen
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Sandra Woodard
23W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Heidi Hill
24W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Claudia Spohner
56W–42L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Shannon Stokley
30W–37L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Laura Cross
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
Sandy Hughes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Amy Davidson
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Angela Allen
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Elaine Eternod
16W–27L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Eve Tubman
68W–26L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Christie Whittle
41W–38L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jenny Spain
32W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karyn Haydock
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Ligon
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Haigwood
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Togliatti
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.